Meeting (Dating, Hookup, Whatever) apps…

Ghosting v 1024x538We all know what they are. 

Many of us use them. 

They’re an outgrowth of social media and honestly, in my opinion our lack of ability to have a conversation with each other in person and perhaps fear.

It’s a lot easier to go down in flames on an application than to go down in a bar in front of your friends.

So part of the fear is the fear of rejection. I assume there’s a lot of fear in general too. I mean in a society where someone is more likely to film you being mugged than to stop the mugging, an application provides a safety margin and the ability to keep someone at arms length until you decide if they’re someone that you’d actually like to meet.

The downside is that instead of someone seeing you as you really are, and you them. Both of you have the opportunity to create completely fictitious personas. If these personas decide to meet then there’s the very real possibility that as the personas meet and dissolve, the two people are left with a critical choice.

ghosting101.pngTry to pick up the pieces of the fractured personas or call each other assholes. In many cases, meeting never happens. One party or the other “Ghosts”. Technically it’s a no harm, no foul, but one person is always left not knowing what they did, or didn’t do.

At least in a bar, you know from the other person’ body language that your advances are a no go. With the online world, the conversation just stops mid thought.

Another problem with online dating apps is that some people just engage in conversations that lead nowhere and then get pissy when you call them on it. Then there are those people that are trying to have affairs and who are so dishonest with even themselves that they can’t believe that someone might actually be just a simple honest person. 

You know, that unicorn of unicorns… Someone that’s honest in their profile and honest in their intentions.

The thing that really blows me away is the folks that “MEGA-Ghost”

These are the folks that not only stop communicating but also delete their profiles on whatever app and then completely disappear. I’ve personally run into a couple of these folks. What’s weird is when they do this and their stated intentions were just to find friends. 

2a11eb0547a0d8b0eea9670390bbc5f3It’s always gone something like this;

Them: “Wow you’re really nice, I’d like to meet sometime.”

Me: “Yes, that would be nice what are you thinking about? Coffee? Drink? Light lunch?”

Them: “Sure, that sounds nice.”

Me: “Okay, when and where?”

….

I honestly don’t understand why suddenly asking when and where causes silence and ghosting.

All you have to say is, “We’ll have to schedule it”. OR “You know I’m not ready to go there yet, can we just chat a while longer?” OR “I’m sorry, this is too scary; too fast; or I’m not ready to meet”

I’m a big boy, I can take it and we could go on chatting as before.

But damn! There’s no need to completely disappear. 

I recently ran into this kind of situation with a man who said they were looking for men in the local area with similar interests for friendship. Their profile said he wanted to go hiking and that he was looking for someone to talk with have an occasional drink and do outdoors stuff.

I don’t know what his true motive was, but we’d been chatting some, and even had made jokes about people not being clear about their wants. We live within 2 miles of each other and both of us could use a friend to go do stuff when we’re not up for the obligations of our respective relationships. You know… Having some guy time where you can say what you want and not worry about offending anyone.

If you’re hiking on a trail, you can say what you want without being accused of some heinous thought crime.

It was a Friday night, and just five minutes before he went silent, He’d said that he was alone for the next week as his wife was out of town and that he was bored.

I told him hey, “Let’s meet down at the bar. We can have a drink and get to know each other in person. From there we can see if we want to plan a hike or something.”

Ghost! 👻

What the hell?

It’s gotta be me. I must be too direct or something.

I figure anyone with a set of balls should be able to meet for a drink and see if the entertaining conversation is as much fun in person.

But apparently, that’s not the way we do things anymore.

I guess I should take it as the final test.

If I ask someone to have a drink, coffee, lunch, or whatever and they freak out. I should count my blessings and be thankful that I’m not going to get caught up in their drama.

I tend to take people at face value, If you tell me you’d like to get together I assume that you’re not lying and the next logical step is to arrange to meet. After all we don’t need to get carpal tunnel in front of our computer keyboards when we can actually chat in person.

Humm, maybe I’ll put that in my “Profile” and see if that changes the behaviors.

GOD, I miss the good ‘ol days of bars and real conversation.

Happy whatever the hell this holiday was…

This used to be a perfect holiday when I was a kid.

It provided a great respite from the first month of school and made things bearable. the three day weekend was so welcome, but of course I had to deal with some teacher that wanted to give us homework which I always put off until Monday night.

I suppose old habits die hard. It appears that Ive done the same thing with this blog post.

But at least I odn’t have to worry about a teacher being upset that I didn’t do my homework.

I do however need to pound the pavement for s new job as soon as possible.

Im beginning to think that I’m not going to have the opportunity to get away for any time at all. Not cool, but I may not have any choice in the matter, the way things are going.

But it was a nice holiday weekend, if for nothing else than me not having to go anywhere or interact with anyone.

I hope everyone’s weekend was a nice one.

PG&E Makes Northern California like a third world country

Purge anarchy 0In an effort to curb wildfires, PG&E started shutting down the power due to high winds in Northern California.

It may take them up to 7 days to restore power to the affected areas.

SAY WHAT?

How about PG&E simply fixing or maintaining their equipment? Oh Right… They’ve filed for bankruptcy because of all the law suits from the last major fire that they were apparently responsible for. Uh, what the hell is going on here? They didn’t have to kill the power in the 70’s, 80’s or 90’s so what’s changed?

Could it be that in order to keep profits and executive salaries high they’ve skimped on maintenance? Could it be that zoning and over development have created a situation where too many high tension lines have been run out to places that are inaccessible and therefore not easily maintained?

I’ll admit that I think it’s funny as hell.

Rickandmorty ep210I’d love to see San Francisco and Sacramento plunged into darkness. Both bastions of insanity could do with a nice long dark wake up call.

How would all the electric cars be recharged? OMG it would be a disaster and people’s cell phones have to be recharged. What? no computers, internet, streaming services? You mean we have to, gasp… talk to each other face to face?  After the first night it would probably look like something out of The Purge.

And why would it take up to 7 days to restore power?

All PG&E is doing is shutting down the grid.  Assuming no damage, shouldn’t it be a simple matter of resetting the system and powering it back up?

Of course, while the power is down maybe PG&E should use the time wisely to make routine repairs and improvements. However, doing that would require planning and certainly overtime pay. Since they’re in bankruptcy it’s unlikely that there is a lot of cash for the overtime, but I’ll bet the top executives are still getting their obscene paychecks.

The mental image of Silicon Valley, San Francisco, and Sacramento residents having to resort to cooking fires while living in their million dollar homes tickles me to no end.

But we all know that isn’t what’s going to happen. In fact here is the outtage map.

It’s mostly the people who can’t afford to live in the cities who are being affected. You know, the workers that have to get up at 4am to get ready for their commute of 2.5 hours to work. Then they’ll have to deal with streetlights being out and signal lights not working, when they finally do get to work the odds are pretty good they’ll have some jerk supervisor that chastises, or outright punishes them for being late.

I guess my point is that instead of PG&E killing the power, they should be working to make sure that the power lines don’t come down in the first place. 

But California is apparently fine with being plunged into the dark ages. So long as Silicon Valley, San Francisco, and Sacramento don’t go dark. 

I could make a killing selling flint knives and stone clubs.

New OS… New features and challenges

macos catalina large.jpgMaybe I am a fanboi.

Apple released Catalina yesterday and I upgraded my computer immediately.

Still having some issues that I’m ironing out, but generally speaking the upgrade went perfectly.  I’ve continued the job search without missing a beat and have been taking breaks from the job search to tweak little settings here and there.

Stability and speed are good and some of the newer features I’m liking, while others just seem to be (at this point) a little more complicated than they need to be.

Part of that may be a learning curve in that I’m reaching for things where they were and not where they are.

I thought I’d eliminated all the 32 bit applications from my system a while ago, but I was wrong. Catalina found several apps that were still 32 bit. Thankfully I don’t use them very much so it’s not “Mission Critical” For me to jump right on replacing them.

There is one that may be a stumbling block but i’m probably going to be able to Create a VMware environment for that one. Although when I went to see if there was an update, I found that the company is only just now working on a 64 bit version and then I realized that my copy of the application was 3 years old with no updates since I purchased it.  Really???? Come on guys, it’s not like you didn’t have time to prepare.

The last of the backups is nearing completion. There are advantages to having multiple backups, But the disadvantage is that you have to update multiple backups and that can be time consuming. This is especially true if one of your backups is a little on the large size and the system decides that it needs to thin it out. Grrrrr.

In any case things are progressing as they should.

On to the next challenge.

I begin to understand the Europeans privacy concerns

icon-privacy-1_0.pngNot that I had that many questions about their reasoning. 

I just spent about an hour and a half cleaning up the “Subscriptions” in my Outlook.com account.

Most of these subscriptions appear to have been generated by my reading an email from one of the many offshore headhunters. I refuse to call them placement agents because they’re not actually helpful at all, and they’re not contracted placement agents for any of the companies they’re supposedly contacting me about.

What I found interesting is that each of these subscriptions was associated with a personal email address and I don’t recall doing anything but reading the email. So obviously there is some backend process running on the outlook server side of things. 

None of these subscriptions appeared in my local email clients. My computer is secure but the surprising thing is that Microsoft allows this on their servers. Oh and by the way you have to delete them all individually.

Fun NOT!

This all started because of LinkedIn. I got curious about where they were getting some of the “Suggested” contacts. How do they know who I know, if those people aren’t actually on LinkedIn? 

To answer that question I started digging. As I looked at the suggested contacts I noticed that there were many from a very old contact list. For example, there were people that I haven’t interacted with for many years. Yet there were also more current people. I realized that the list was being refreshed, but from where? 

Then as I dug around I found out that the list was being populated from my Outlook.com account. This is an email account that I use but I don’t store a current contact list there. That was when I found out that LinkedIn may not have a way to disconnect or shield your contact list from them. Once you’ve shared it, you can’t say stop. LinkedIn periodically refreshes the list presenting you with “New” potential contacts to connect with.

The problem is, what if you’re trying to protect the privacy of the people that you know. After all, if you’re interested in privacy, shouldn’t you also be concerned about the privacy of the people in your contact list?

Then I logged into Outlook.com and found the source list, I also discovered that deleting all your contacts on Outlook.com isn’t as easy as it might appear. While I could select all the contacts with one checkbox, I couldn’t select delete. de-selecting all the contacts and selecting one, or a few, would allow me to click delete. I found that I could select about 35-30 entries and delete them in bulk.

Then you have to go to the “Deleted Contacts” folder and do the deletion all over again.

Now it’s just a matter of waiting for the LinkedIn site to refresh and see if the contacts will be removed.

While checking around the Outlook site to find out if there was any way for me to simply disconnect LinkedIn, I stumbled upon the long list of “Subscriptions” that I don’t recall ever saying I’d like to sign up for.

By the way, LinkedIn doesn’t show up as an authorized application in Outlook’s site. So you can’t sever the connection simply from this side either.

I suppose it’s an oversight on the part of the LinkedIn folks, perhaps the Outlook folks, perhaps both

It does seem strange that there isn’t anyway to wipe or stop the personal contact list sharing.

I suppose sometime long ago when I created the LinkedIn account I must have misread the terms of sharing my contacts. I don’t think I understood that this was a permanent feature. I think, I believed it was a one time use.

I suppose this should serve as a cautionary tale.

If you’re interested in privacy, yours, or others make sure that you can revoke access to anything you’ve shared.

I think I begin to understand why the Europeans are such sticklers about maintaining control over their data.

We should be as vigilant here, but our lawmakers don’t have a clue about technology. It’s beyond them and will continue to be beyond them until they admit they don’t know technology. Hopefully at that point they’ll wise up and actually hire or appoint people with the knowledge and right skills to actually come up with a coherent policy on matters of privacy, data-sharing, and technology in general. 

That won’t be a perfect solution, but it might be a step in the right direction.