Stop Looking at me

Some background.

I’m a big believer that wearable sensor technology can, and should improve life. I think that with the American healthcare system in the shambles it is, essentially we’re going to be on our own for most healthcare.

I’ve written elsewhere in this blog about the difficulties in finding or seeing competent healthcare professionals.

From Dermatology appointments that are booked 6-9 months out, to primary care physicians that can’t book an appointment until well into the future, with doctors that don’t even speak English well enough for the patient to understand their instructions. The medical industry for various reasons is a complete shitshow.

We needn’t talk about the fact that many primary care physicians these days rarely actually touch the patient. Instead they sit or stand behind their computers being data entry clerks. They’re reluctant to even do the rudimentary action of listening to the patient’s heart. Because the data entry is more important than the actual patient. (Except when it comes to insurance billing. Then they want to know about financial responsibility and next of kin so that they can track the patient down in the event that insurance doesn’t pay.)

Hey men, when was the last time your Doctor did the old “Turn & Cough” routine? How many of you even remember what that is?

How is it that America can claim to have the most advanced healthcare in the world, and yet have some of the poorest patient treatment outcomes?

There are some amazing “saves”. I’ve got a friend that is with us because his wife was dialing 911 before he hit the ground.

On the other hand, I’ve got another friend that got put through the medical wringer during COVID. Because of the delay in treatment, and requirements to be vaccinated. In his case a relatively minor skin cancer, ended up metastasizing throughout his system into lung cancer. (Uhh No, He never smoked.)

I myself have found that obtaining medical routine medical care is a “challenge” (Beware of any politician touting Medicare for all as one of their campaign planks.)

Because I believe that we’re going to be on our own, especially if you’re an average genetic male, one viable alternative is wearable sensors and their ability to provide daily medical data that we monitor ourselves. This kind of data gives us a baseline for our particular “Normal” and deviations from our “Normal” state, can guide us to take care of ourselves. At least it gives us a fighting chance to use the 6 minutes that a doctor is going to pay attention to us, wisely.

I picture it something like, “Hey Doc, this and this are out of my normal range, what should be done?”

I also think that having reliable telemetry would reduce overall healthcare costs by helping to reduce unnecessary and wildly expensive tests. Who hasn’t had their doctor demand exploratory testing only to find out that the test or tests were unnecessary?

Because I was a believer and willing to do what I could to advance the technology, I started participating in the Apple Health Research program via the Apple Research App. I’ve been doing this for years. The research app asked simple questions, and requested access to medical telemetry from my Apple Watch or other sensors and honestly was pretty darn simple and non invasive in my body or my life. I’d been enrolled in one study for 537 days.

Note I said “Was” and the other uses of past tense.

50 days ago I received an invitation about another study. This one was a little more involved. Nothing that I wasn’t willing to do, even including the study requesting some blood samples. Fine, I’m willing to bleed for my belief that technology is going to make us more independent of the “Medical Industrial Complex”.

Oh, I use that term with purpose.

By now it’s become painfully obvious that the Medical industry is nothing more than a mechanism for generating obscene profits, and in addition, the medical industry is probably as much about control of a populace that doesn’t ask questions. Those of us who do ask questions in an attempt to understand why a particular treatment is better than another, are listed as “Difficult Patients”. Once designated with this label, you’ll find your overall care is significantly degraded. Independent thought, or questioning the Arch Practitioners of arcane medical arts is seen as heresy. People who question, should be put into camps to die, right? Reference events from 2020 – 2024. There were entertainers, pundits, wags, and even some politicians, who said that kind of thing live, on air. Often to “seal claps” of a wonderfully compliant audience.

That kind of thing made my blood run cold, and fueled my desire to assist any real research. My hope was/is at least the technology could be improved allowing average, and reasonably intelligent people to use it to their advantage, providing hard data about their own bodies to push back against a medical person or establishment trying to railroad them into some treatment that was questionable. Or worse, touted as the only treatment available when there were other equally effective treatments that their physician simply didn’t like.

Oddly, if you look at outcomes, the key differentiator between one treatment and another often boils down to money. Either how much the insurance company will pay, or how much profit the hospital or clinic can derive. Many times, the patient outcome is the same, plus or minus a few percentage points.

So I was in. I signed all their paperwork, I noted that they were willing to pay a small amount for participation but that amount was trivial.

A week or so later I got an email confirming an “On boarding” appointment. That email contained a link to a website. Okay… The link required that I create an account. Hmm it’s just a teleconference appointment. I can set one of those up on FaceTime, or Half a dozen other services wherein only the administrator of the teleconference needs to have an account. The participants don’t have to provide any information whatsoever. All they need is a conference ID number.

Then I thought about it and remembered that because medical data is protected under HIPPA, they might need some kind of more secure conference. Okay, I created an account. I didn’t like it, but for the sake of the research it was probably worth it.

The conference day comes and I’m logged into the video site. The person on the other end of the call asks a bunch of questions and such. None of which were any different than something I’d tell a stranger. They walked me through changing a few settings regarding permissions on my phone so the research app could read that data, then the conference was over, and I was in.

Immediately, my phone started burning 10 – 15% more power per day. This was because the study was accessing my phone’s camera every single time the phone was moved. The theory was that they were trying to capture and process facial expressions and face shape using the onboard AI. I suspect there were two points to this image capture. One, was to insure that the phone was only being accessed by a single person. The second reason was to try to capture data that could be correlated to the mood of that person throughout their average day. (Was the person stressed, depressed, angry, sad, etc.)

The first issue was kind of dumb. If the person was only moving the phone but unable to unlock it, then they weren’t an authorized user. Any additional data captured about the person’s expression or facial shape was therefore moot. It would have to be excluded from the study data.

The second issue might have made more sense if the analysis only happened after the phone was unlocked. Trouble was, the study was burning energy capturing photos of the inside of hand bags, backpacks, ceilings, and back pockets. The analysis literally activated if I slid the phone out of the way to make room for something else on my desk or counter top.

I’m pretty sure the camera was active the entire time the phone was in my back pocket while I was walking the dog. I don’t know for sure, but I can say that the camera was active even before I unlocked the phone to read a text message or answer a phone call. So what valid data was the study actually getting?

How much of that data was going to be fed into some processor to refine the newer generation of cars that supposedly won’t allow you to drive them if an AI in the car decides you’re too angry, stressed or otherwise impaired to operate a vehicle?

I can tell you from experience, that transporting a loved one to an ER I was extremely stressed and very focused (You kind of have to be, doing 90MPH on a Southern California freeway where nobody obeys the “Slower traffic keep right” rule).

The last thing I’d tolerate in that situation was an AI in my car refusing to let me get a person to an ER. I’d be so pissed when I got back from a $300 taxi ride, or paying $500 to an ambulance that I’d go at an AI in my car with sharp objects and a soldering iron. Asinine Federal safety laws be damned!

This realization gave me pause about my participation in the study. I however continued.

Weeks go by and I grudgingly tolerated my phone “looking” at me & draining power no matter the situation.

Then came the email from the study. It was an email, that told me I had an email. You know the kind I’m talking about. We get them from our mortgage companies, insurance companies, and banks all the time. “Oh you have a message, login to your account to read this important message.” Then you log in and the “important” message is that interest rates have changed on your savings account. Duh, we all already knew that because the Prime Interest Rate was changed, or stayed the same, or another quarter closed.

In other words the important message could have been sent via normal email and didn’t require special handling.

I knew what the email from the study was. It was most likely a lab order requesting that I make an appointment to go have some blood drawn for the study. Since the study itself was a double blind study. It’s entirely likely that the name was a number, the billing code was one that belonged to the study, and the requested testing was a standard panel. None of which required security. In fact the message could have been sent to any modern email program fully encrypted if the study had simply provided a PGP or RSA key during the initial setup/onboarding.

To make matters worse, whoever sent the email, didn’t send a link. What they sent was an entire HTTP file that opened a page locally in my browser. Because the page had been opened locally with no connections to the actual server it was supposed to open on, the page failed. My email program had dutifully tossed the entire email into my “Junk Mail” folder because that is exactly the kind of behavior scammers use to trick people into resetting passwords and user names.

I, on the other hand knew what I was looking at, and pulled the file apart until I found that it was supposed to be a link to a secure CISCO Mail delivery program. I accessed the server properly and was presented with… You guessed it, “Hey you need to create another account. Please provide a unique user ID and a 12 character password. Don’t forget, your password must have upper and lower case characters, numbers, and at least 2 special characters.”

I tired using the unique user ID and password from the video conferencing account. No Joy! That was a different format. Then I realized I hadn’t used that conferencing account more than once. I wondered, “just how many accounts am I going to have to create and maintain with forced password changes every 90 days, for this damn study?”

I jiggled my phone on the desk putting down my morning coffee. My phone took a clear unobstructed 45 second long picture of my ceiling.

At that point, I’d had enough.

The research app has communications built in. My email has encrypted communications built in. My phone is burning power to no good end, and I wondered how many pictures they had of my private parts.

I was perfectly willing to be inconvenienced by going and having blood drawn but I wasn’t interested in some unknown number of accounts needing to be created in service of this study. I’m trying to minimize my digital footprint, and all these people were doing was expanding it.

Every single user ID and password these people wanted was another opportunity for some shithead hacker to get information they could use to screw me. And it was painfully clear that the people running the study weren’t particularly good with technology.

So I withdrew from not only the new study, but every study these people were running. If they can’t handle the basics, how can they be relied upon to correlate the data?

Then, I deleted the Research App from my phone.

The next day, I got a call from a lovely lady asking me if I’d gotten their email about my upcoming blood draw. “Uhhh yes I did,” I replied. She asked if she could help me set up the appointment and I said, “Uhh NOPE! Then explained I’d withdrawn from the study.”

She thought I’d withdrawn because I was afraid of the blood work. I explained that wasn’t the problem. Then explained what the problem(s) were. I continued, I as an older person had no interest in multiple accounts just to support their study and that perhaps they’d be better served having a single web page that supported all the necessary functions required by the study. I also pointed out that I was sure they’d gotten some lovely photos of my ceiling, my back pocket, and the inside of my backpack. I added I’m sure that someone was equally thrilled to have pictures of my “Johnson” too since I tended to be nude, surprisingly, in my own home, and my bedroom, in particular.

She was understandably flummoxed.

She recovered well, and pointed out that the call was being recorded. I said, “Great! Then there will be no confusion about why I dropped out.” I asked her to make sure the IT people, in particular those that came up with this insanity rethink their approach. While I’m willing to share information with them, I’m not interested in having my participation in their study become a full time job involving an unknown number of “Surprise” accounts that have to be created, just to deal with the basics.

She said she’d refer the matter to the IT people and that she’d initiate the payout for my contributions to the study.

I said, “That’s fine. The money isn’t important but a clean efficient study is.”

This morning, I got a call from the study payout group. Another lovely lady wanted to verify my email address because they were going to send me a “Virtual” debit card that would be loaded with $70. She went on to tell me that this card could be used anywhere, or that the funds on it could be transferred to my bank account or Apple Pay account.

“Okay, that’s fine,” I said. A minute later I got an email from the study payout group. They directed me to a website where my “Virtual” debit card awaited. Then I got another email saying that the debit card had $70 on it.

Sure enough, there was the card, and it claimed to have $70 loaded on it. But there was no way to transfer the amount anywhere. No matter, I had the number, expiration date, and security number.

I tried to use the card online to pay a couple of subscriptions.

I couldn’t.

While puzzling over why I couldn’t use the funds. I noticed the following in the terms and conditions.

Unless otherwise specified, not redeemable for merchandise, food and beverage. Allpurchases made with this card are subject to the applicable refund and exchange policy and the amount of ClinCard’s any refunds will be placed back on card. Not redeemable for cash except where required by law. Not reloadable. Not a credit or debit card.

There was also a helpful 1-800 phone number.

I called it. It was a Canadian Bank. After navigating through their phone tree I got a helpful person to whom I explained the problem and quoted the text above. Then I asked so what is this card good for?

He didn’t know. He helpfully suggested that I keep trying random sites until it worked.

Either it’s money or it’s not… I didn’t go into that with him.

I asked how I might transfer this cash to a usable platform.

He responded that I could go to their website or download their app, open an account, provide my banking information, and then I’d be able to transfer the cash to another account.

I fired back, “So you’re telling me that to get this $70, I’ll have to give you all the information necessary for you to steal my identity and since you’re in Canada international law applies, meaning that my privacy is not secure under even the most minimal laws of the United States and any disputes will be handled under EU rules or would that be under Canadian rules?”

He had no response.

So ladies & gentlemen, that’s how I made $70 selling my body and how that $70 is in no way real.

Beware virtual debit cards!

I rather suspect they’re nothing more than a mechanism to turn us all into data products to be sold to the highest bidder.

It’s a great scam if you think about it. These people offer you money you can’t access, then tell you to access those funds they’ll just need a little bit more information. When you give them the information they’ll give you the cash. On the back end, they’ll make 1000 times more money selling your information to data brokers.

The thing is, the clinical study could have texted the $70 to my phone number (which they had on file,) and it would have been loaded automatically onto my Apple Cash card. That would have cut out the middleman and provided instant payment.

They could also have sent it to Zelle, or Venmo. The accounting would have been no different. They just had to have yet another corporate entity in the mix.

Here’s the recap of corporations:

Apple
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
GlobalMed
CISCO
SUVODA
ClinCard
Greenphire

Really?

And they turned on my phone camera for hours during the day, while using the devices and sensors I purchased to collect information for their study. They in turn, provided literally nothing but annoyance.

To anyone who might be reading this that is in the medical industry, Do Better!

The study cohort invites you into their lives and their homes. They give you information freely and while you claim to “pay” for that information, the reality appears to be much different.

I might consider joining another research study in the future. But I’ll be far more interested in doing so if that study was geared specifically to Men’s health issues. Right at the moment, I’ll be leaving the Apple Research application off my phone.

We really dodged a bullet in the 2024 election.

As the scandal continues to explode around the Minnesota Somalis I can’t help thinking that this would be so much worse if Tim Walz was the Vice President.

I suspect that D.C. The Harris/Walz administration, and the media would be tying themselves up in knots trying to brush it off as a conspiracy theory, misinformation, or they’d be censoring the hell out of it. In any event, not much actual work of government would be getting done because they’d be fighting fires.

Whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork saying that Walz and others in Minnesota literally ignored irregularities that they were reporting. Some of those whistleblowers are saying that they suffered threats, intimidation, and retaliation for doing their jobs to protect taxpayer money.

Last I heard we’re talking 1 billion dollars in fraud. Some reports suggest that the amount could be higher. 

Like other Americans, I’m asking how the hell that kind of fraud could be ignored. It begs another more concerning question though…

How much fraud is there in other states is connected with the influx of illegal immigrants or more generalized state fraud.

The government shutdown shined a light on EBT/SNAP fraud. It also scratched at the surface of the festering scab of Medicare/Medicaid, and insurance fraud.

Which leads me to ask, “How much of our horribly unbalanced national budget is fraudulent to begin with?

The IRS comes after average citizens for $600. I guess that makes sense, if you’ve got billions in fraud, then you’ve got to find more money somewhere.

The thing is, it looks like this kind of fraud has been going on for years, possibly decades and we don’t really know how far it goes. 

That continuing resolution Congress just passed is probably still funding this kind of thing. I expect the next budget fight will be contentious and will shut the government down for another extended period. Perhaps it should. With these revelations, I hope that Congress actually does its job and manages the purse strings instead of kicking the can further down the damn road.

It also adds fuel to the fire regarding illegal immigrants. Given what we’ve seen with the Somali fraud, it seems reasonable to look very closely at every immigrant “service” to figure out exactly how much of our annual budget is being sucked up by supporting illegal immigration via NGO’s.

I think It also galvanizes a more nationalistic view on the part of the American people.

We’ve asked for years, “Why are there veterans homeless? Why are the elderly having to choose between their medication and food? Why is it better to be an illegal immigrant in the United States than being a citizen in terms of monthly stipends? How is it possible that Social Security is going broke?

Now we have at least some inkling of what may have been going on.

If I were an illegal immigrant, I’d be packing my bags.

I think as this scandal expands, so will the ICE mandate. Whereas now ICE clams they’re targeting criminal illegals, I’m betting that soon it will be ALL illegals whether or not they’ve committed subsequent crimes after their first infraction, (crossing the border without permission).

Who is Sydney Sweeny

11725_SydneySweeney 960x720.A while back I heard this name Sydney Sweeney.

It appears she’s some actress. I figured, “Ignore”.

I thought it was another actress shooting her mouth off about something or other. I didn’t bother opening any articles about whatever controversy she was involved in. I assumed that she was another Hollywood dumbass shrieking about any of the 10 issues that they’re always shrieking about. 

Trump, ICE, Deportations, Trans Rights, Abortion, Republicans are NAZIs, blah, blah, blah.

American eagle sydney sweeney.I thought that whatever she was saying, and whoever she was, would blow over and I’d never hear the name again.

And indeed it did blow over, eclipsed by the next “Crisis” of the 24 hour news cycle.

I guess the crisis was the government shutdown.

But in the past couple of days she popped up again. I thought, “What fresh hell?”

Then as I was clicking around on the internet last night, I inadvertently clicked on some article about her in some interview.

American Eagle ad Sydney Sweeney has great jeans American Eagle.Apparently, the first controversy that I ignored was that Sweeney had appeared in a Jeans ad for American Eagle. The tag line was “Sydney Sweeney has Great Jeans”

Sweeney was in a short video ad. She’s got a great figure, and the ad itself hearkened back to a point in our history where models with good figures routinely displayed merchandise in suggestive poses. You’d think it would be another ad campaign that came and went.

It should have.

Except, that because she was a white woman appearing in an ad with the tag line “Great Jeans”. Apparently the left lost their shit over it. When is the left not losing their shit over something?

“Great Jeans” was heard by the left morons as “Great Genes” and they made it about race. That’s what started the controversy. Yawn!!!

I don’t know about the rest of America, but I’m really sick of seeing obese people bouncing around in overly tight clothing being portrayed as sex symbols. Yeah, maybe they are to a certain segment of the population, but in the main, I suspect that people would rather see healthy weight models in appropriate clothing in advertisements.

Big Rapper Sues Lyft Dajua Blanding known as Dank Demoss 1024x600 3810616762.Spandex is a privilege, not a right. I’m personally put off seeing women in stretchy fabrics that look like over stuffed sausage casings and being told it’s beautiful.

It’s not. The rapper Dank Demoss is the epitome of what I see when I run across ads with fat models. I realize this entity is too large for even the most outlandish of the ads lately, but she’s the mental image I see.

Sydney Sweeney popped up again in the past few days because of an interview for GQ.

The interviewer, Katherine Stoeffel, appeared to be “fishing” for some kind of controversy and at one point asked, “Is there something that you want to say about the ad itself,” she asked. “The criticism of the content was basically that, maybe specifically in this political climate, white people shouldn’t joke about genetic superiority.

Sweeney replied, “I think that when I have an issue that I want to speak about, people will hear.

Folks loved Sweeney’s answer for a number of reasons. She handled the question, she didn’t make waves, she acknowledged that the question had been asked, and chose not to add any fuel to the controversy.

In a way she let the air out of the controversy entirely. Without saying it, she said that the people who created the controversy made up something to be offended by, then tried to damage her career and the American Eagle brand over nothing.

Yeah, the ad campaign stirred up press with an interesting double entendre, but it wasn’t racist as many in the media claimed. After all an ad is designed to create a need. All ads essentially say, “If you buy our product you’ll be more beautiful, more commanding, shoulder to shoulder with the movers and shakers, in the top 10 percent, on your way to success, etc.”

That’s the nature of advertisement. It’s supposed to feed you a dream. Remember Calvin Klein ads? They were racy as hell and always had hot men and women selling over priced underwear that no-one really saw you wearing. But you knew and that may have boosted your confidence. Was it worth it? Maybe.

Sydney Sweeney does apparently have good genes, and the jeans did look great on her.

I watched the ad. I liked it. 

I liked the nostalgia. I wondered if American Eagle made menswear.

So obviously the Ad did what it was supposed to do. It made me aware of the brand.

I can say that most ads these days don’t do that for me. I can’t tell you about many ads I’ve seen in the past 2 years that made as favorable an impression on me. Most of the ads have some overdriven music or repetitive synthetic percussion beat that’s more annoying than “Ear Catching” and they’re a visual mess. Some ads I’ve seen leave me wondering what the hell the product or brand they were trying to promote were.

Ozempic commercials I remember, because their music is happy happy, but they’ve got a bunch of obese people jiggling around and essentially making fat the new norm. They say to me, “Hey being too fat to comfortably move is okay, and manageable, if you inject this super expensive crap in your body. We’ll be ready with $20,000 knee and hip replacement surgery when you need it. And your health insurance might cover it.”

Jaguar 1732050077767 1732050093241.png.webp.I don’t think that’s really a good message. I personally think that a better message would be “eat right, get more exercise, and you’ll appreciate that people notice your effort.”

Then of course there was the Jaguar commercial. That one is memorable because whatever they were selling, I want no part of.

This latest blip of Sydney Sweeney will pass in a few days. Then she’ll go back to being an actor.

The next crisis will pop up in a day or two. Maybe the government will reopen and the news cycle will be busy painting the Schumer crowd as “Heroes of the Republic,” for voting yes on a Continuing Resolution that they voted “Yes” on multiple times over the past 2 or 3 years.

Or they won’t and the rioting and looting will start.

Either way…

Yawn…

Very confusing messages and candidate.

GettyImages 2230161607 640x480.We all know Newsom is running for President. Come on… we can admit it.

Okay, so what’s his message?

His gerrymandering thing is concerning.

Although I secretly admit that if they redraw the lines, my community might get taken out of Judy Chu’s district and put back into a district belonging to someone who has a clue about where we are, and how our needs differ from the aristocracy in her core area.

That being said, Newsom is 100% wrong. Polls suggest that the people of California oppose his redrawing the lines at this time. We supposedly have a Fair and Impartial redistricting committee put in place by the California electorate to prevent this sort of thing.

That committee was voted for, by the people of California. “Fair and Impartial” has become a somewhat nebulous term these days, especially when it comes to our redistricting committee.

I believe that the lines were in fact gerrymandered in the last redraw. There appeared to be a concerted effort to slice up conservative Republican strongholds in the High Desert communities, and in the Central Valley.

Not that it mattered too much in the 2024 election. If you look at the votes that went for Trump in California, even the coastal cities were a lot redder than in past elections.

Newsom, in my opinion is wrong forcing this issue because he’s essentially saying to the people of California, “You didn’t do it right, so I’m going to defy your will, the California Constitution, and I’m going to do what I please,” I think there’s a term for that… 

In fact there are multiple terms for that, most of which are applied to President Trump every hour of every day. “Dictator”, “Tyrant”, “King”…

How is what Newsom’s doing any different? In a way it underscores that in California the voters only have an illusion of choice.

To me it says, “You the people are in control, only so long as you do things my way. If you defy me, I’m going to take away your control.” That’s not a functioning Democracy, or Republic. That’s the very definition of a dictatorship. Wait, isn’t that one of the things the Democrat party hates about Putin?

Honestly, it’s not a good look for a future President. I don’t care which political party you’re a member of.

Newsom suggested on a podcast with tech journalist Kara Swisher, that Trump was going to place ICE agents at the polls in the midterm election as an act of intimidation.

Wait. What? How is that an act of intimidation? I thought only citizens voted in our safe, free, and fair elections. Why would that be intimidating? Unless Newsom said something he shouldn’t have, implicitly admitting Non-Citizens were voting in our elections.

Noooo that can’t be true. Non-Citizens, illegal or not, would never vote illegally.

I suppose that what he meant to say was ICE presence could deter naturalized Citizens from voting. I could see that, maybe.

But I’ve never known a naturalized citizen who was the least bit hesitant to proudly show their proof of naturalization.

I know a number of people who went through the citizenship process. They’re Mexican, South American, Russian, Ukrainian, and Algerian. These are people I know personally.

Hell some of them I helped coach for their citizenship tests, and guess what? We threw them welcome parties to celebrate their achievement in becoming U.S. Citizens. One of these people I personally took with me to the polling location for a presidential election. It was his first time casting a vote in this country and I was honored to vote with him.

These folks went through the process, they waited their turn, and entered our country legally and with our blessing.

Newsom’s concern about ICE possibly being at the polls could be assuaged if California implemented Voter ID.

I do hope that some bright Republican campaign person takes that thought and runs with it. With voter ID in place, there’s no need to have ICE at the polling places is there?

Newsom told Politico that he believes Trump will run in 2028.

This is a presidential candidate?

Has he read the United States Constitution?

Just because his auntie has become fossilized in Washington D.C. doesn’t mean that Presidential term limits don’t apply. He claimed he’s been sent two dozen Trump 2028 hats.

So? Sure there are people who’d probably like to see Trump in office for 3 terms. However that’s not likely to happen because it would require amending the Constitution.  Changing the Constitution is a big deal and should never be taken lightly. I’ll stand up with a bunch of other people from both political parties to prevent that.

Not because I’m worried about Trump having a third term. But because If we open that door, I believe we open the door to amending or nullifying every other right or limitation of government power enshrined in the Constitution.

Like the right to free speech, freedom from unreasonable search & seizure, to bear arms, and anything else a President or political party finds inconvenient.

We saw in the Biden administration, and during COVID, that there are people who would, without hesitation, abridge our freedoms. We know now that censorship (a clear violation of the First amendment,) was in fact being applied to social media, & internet information sources by our Government. We know this from testimony in congressional hearings.

Even with the Constitutional protections in place, there are breathtaking examples of misuse of power. Those misuses are not limited to the Biden Administration.

Biden’s people were just more rabid, and less subtle in how they tried to take our freedom.

Don’t get me wrong, I have questions and concerns about the Constitutionality of some of Trumps Executive Orders, and if he’s over-reaching the boundaries of his office. I’m also not particularly thrilled about the white house ballroom, and I personally don’t like all the gold leaf he’s applied to rooms in the White House.

That’s not based in politics, it’s a matter of taste and I think it looks tacky. But that’s my opinion. I prefer quiet contemplative spaces and gold sparkling everywhere is distracting to me.

I believe Trump is as prone to all the same mistakes that power and wealth bring as anyone else. Technically he’s “Nouveau riche” so I’ll make allowances for his flashy style. I’m eternally poor, so flash is not in my repertoire.

Thursday and Friday in the wake of the latest school shooting, we have people demanding to take gun ownership away from all Americans. Yet, most of the recent school shootings have been carried out by a very select and specific group.

A group I should add that enjoys considerable legal protection and who actively attempts to censor all dissenting opinions, under the watchful eye of a particular stripe of media & government officials who are interested only in virtue signaling.

These people are not howling for gun control to be safe, they don’t care about children or even who is doing the shooting.

They want the kind of censorship and oppression that’s becoming commonplace in the UK, where grannies can be arrested for saying they like bacon at a muslim protest. Where little girls are arrested for defending themselves against rape in Scotland.

Scotland!?!

Of all places I’d never have expected a little girl to be arrested for defending herself. I’d have expected her to be hoisted up on the shoulders of burly men in full clan colors, taken to the town square and having the mayor say “Good on you lass.”

But nope! She’s arrested for protecting herself, only because some scum migrant thought he was entitled to have his filthy way with her. Had it been anyone but a muslim migrant she’d be sitting home with her parents having a cup of tea. Why? Because politicians keep virtue signaling and making excuses that Muslims don’t understand they’re not supposed to rape women or little girls. What happened to “Believe all women?” Or that violence against women mustn’t be tolerated? Or that sexualization of children is bad?

All that goes out the window, when politicians, any politicians, can use the situation to virtue signal. Usually, they’re virtue signaling to a group their either fear, or that gives them some perceived advantage with a voting block.

Newsom claims he’s getting tough on crime, yet refuses to fully fund proposition 36. He claims it would be too costly and the state is running a deficit. Proposition 36 passed in a landslide. Something over 60%. It was the will of the people, you know, that “Democracy” Newsom claims to represent…

It essentially reversed a soft on crime stance that permitted theft up to a certain dollar amount without being a felony. So, go to your local Target or Walmart with a calculator, stay under $900 or so and steal as much as you can. Just stay under the limit and you’ll be out of jail, if you’re caught, within hours.

At the same time, Newsom is spending millions on his gerrymandering scheme “Defending against an existential threat to Democracy.” 

Let me get this straight, he’s denying democracy, to “defend” democracy?

He’s doing this over Texas redistricting to improve representation of a two party electorate? Texas politics is not something I’m at all conversant in. But if Texas is un-gerrymandering its congressional districts in an attempt to create more balanced Congressional representation, isn’t that a good thing?

Don’t even get me started on Newsom’s messaging on X. He’s all over the map!

Maybe Newsom really is a “Lizard Person” He’s certainly acting like a chameleon hanging on a flatscreen TV.

Don’t worry my dogs are friendly…

“Don’t worry my dogs are friendly…” Said the guy opening his car door, letting his 2 dogs run off leash at the trail head a week or so ago.

Both dogs ran barking and snapping, directly at me & Jesse (who I had on his leash). One caught my pups jaw with a tooth then went for his throat and legs. The other came at me snarling & trying to bite me. I dropped the leash so Jesse had free motion and I had both hands to defend myself.

Jesse is amazingly fast and agile. He got a piece of his attacker and had blood all over his mouth and face while their owner was yelling & threatening me as though somehow I or my dog were at fault.

Fortunately, there were plenty of witnesses and a sign that clearly said “NO DOGS OFF LEASH”. When the authorities arrived, the witnesses all pointed at the dudes dogs as aggressors giving statements. Jesse & I were sitting on a tall rock. He was still on guard but was a good boy while I rinsed his wounds with water from our hydration pack. I was able to clean, assess, and dress his wounds on the spot. (Put together a dog first aid kit. It pays to be prepared!)

A Ranger brought Jesse his bandanna lost in the fracas, approaching very gently and quietly. He climbed up on the rock with us & Jesse nuzzled him to put the bandanna back on.

“That guy is trying to claim your dog is aggressive and mean,” he said as he retied the bandanna.

“I’m just not seeing it, his dog is pretty chewed up though. He’s demanding you pay the vet bill. Don’t worry, he’s not got a leg to stand on, he’s getting a hefty ticket right now. How’s this fella?” He gave Jesse some ear scritches.

“He’s okay, it think. There’s a cut from a tooth on his jaw, a couple of small punctures on his leg and another puncture near his shoulder towards his neck. They’re minor. I’ve cleaned ’em & hit ’em with antibiotic ointment. I’ll watch him for the next few days. He’ll be at the vet if he’s not healing or I find anything worse when we get home.” 

“Good,” the Ranger said, “Would you like me to hold the leash while you clean up the wound on your leg?” Jesse gave the Ranger a lick, asking for more ear scritches.

I was so worried about my pup, I hadn’t noticed I’d been injured and was bleeding pretty good. I rinsed my wound, & grabbed the human first aid kit from the pack to fix myself up.

The Ranger smiled, “Nice to see someone prepared even if 99% of the time they don’t need to be. You guys walk this trail a lot. I’ve never seen a vehicle, would you like a ride home?”

Folks, there’s a darn good reason to keep your dog on a leash. It’s as much for their safety as it is for others. You have no idea how far from home someone is, or if they, or their dog is old or has bad knees/other health conditions. Keeping control of your dog is super important so everyone can have a nice walk/hike.

That being said, drop the leash if your dog is attacked. They know what to do, and a former street dog like my pup knows how to end it pretty quick. 

Neither of us will have lasting physical damage & we got a ride in a ranger’s truck home. So that’s off our bucket list.