I’m totally sick of the Abortion shit!
Although there have been some headlines that have made me laugh.
Sex Strike! Abstinence trends on Twitter in wake of Roe v. Wade ruling
As if a man would want to have sex with this one…
She looks like she stepped off the set of John Carpenter’s Ghosts of Mars
Then there’s this one.
Not at all a flattering angle.
The general consensus among lots of Men seems to be; “Your Terms are acceptable”
Women, really need to realize, Men don’t need them to pleasure ourselves. We might prefer to have a woman in our beds. But if the pain in the ass level is too high, we’ll find alternatives.
One need only look at the sex toy industry, or even a single online catalog and you’ll find there are a multitude of very pleasurable substitutes that cost less than Dinner and Drinks on one date.
All of the above are reviewed at GQ The Best Sex Toys for Men
The beauty of some of these toys is that they’re easily cleanable, or in some cases entirely disposable. Oh… Don’t forget a decent lubricant!
Then there’s Pink.
Who is she? Why Should I care? I don’t think I’ve ever heard any of her music, and see zero need to do so now.
Then there’s this one from Elizabeth Warren…
Biden Needs to Make ‘Federal Lands in Place Where Abortions Can Occur’
When I read this one, I pictured this
We know how the US Government is about reservations…
Then there’s this from AOC
AOC: Arkansas abortion ban ‘will kill people’
That title was provocative enough that I pulled up the video. She does justify her statement somewhat.
All that being said…
Nowhere in the constitution does it say, “Sure, hack up that baby growing inside you, then scoop the pieces out of your womb.”
Abortion is not birth control it’s fucking murder. I don’t give a runny shit how you try to sanitize it.
I’m in favor of abortion in the case of rape. No question about it. A man who rapes a woman doesn’t deserve to reproduce, ever! Further I’d say castrate the fucker, cut ‘em off sack and all, when he’s caught.
Don’t bother with a nice clean surgery center, a decent knife, and four stout men. (Two to hold his legs open, one to pin him down, and one to wield the knife! As you can tell, I don’t have any mercy for rape.) That alone would have a chilling effect on rapists across the country.
I’m in favor of abortions in the case of incest. Our species shouldn’t be weakening itself by narrowing genetic diversity. Just look at the Royals of Europe.
I’m in favor of abortions in the case of mother’s life versus continuing the pregnancy.
What I’m not in favor of is abortion just because the couple, (Yes, the Man and the Woman) were too stupid, or too lazy, to avail themselves of the myriad options available to prevent the pregnancy in the first place.
Abortion, generally speaking is not about women’s health it’s about covering up that the couple was irresponsible.
It’s about a woman taking the rights of a man too. There are some men, who want children, and who may only have one time in their lives when they can father them.
The implied message of Abortion is that men can always father children. Who cares if half a dozen of their potential offspring are murdered before they have a child?
That’s not always the case. Lower male fertility rate statistics show it clearly.
How many men find out too late that they’re functionally sterile because of pollution, hormones or chemicals, in the water, or other factors?
How many men look back on their girlfriends or fiancé’s who got abortions and wish they’d had the joy of holding their child in their arms?
I’ll grant you there may not be a huge preponderance. I’m willing to bet there are men jerking off into cups at fertility clinics for sperm counts, while their wife waits in the lounge, who wish they’d had a say when their ex-girlfriend took off to an abortion clinic.
My view will not be popular. Fine. It’s the way I see it. You don’t have to agree, just as I don’t have to agree that rampant abortion is just hunky dory, or empowering.
This SCOTUS ruling doesn’t ban abortion. All it does, is say that abortion is not enshrined in the Constitution. It kicks the issue back to the states for their legislatures to decide.
The SCOTUS is supposed to rule on the constitutionality of laws. That’s it, they’re not supposed to legislate from the bench. Congress makes the Laws.
And yes, theoretically this could reverse Gay marriage. It could also theoretically reverse rulings on inter-racial marriage.
I don’t think it will.
There’s a difference between marriage and abortion.
Marriage is about pursuing individual happiness, and living the life you choose to live, with the partner of your choice. Both parties enter into a marriage with open eyes and are presumably adults exercising their rights to live in freedom.
I hold that neither the State or Federal government has any say in the matter. Marriage is essentially a contract.
That laws and rulings had to be made to limit State and Federal interference in the lives of citizens regarding who they could marry, speaks volumes about the level of control the State and Federal governments unconstitutionally exercised.
Abortion fundamentally denies the right of an unborn child to life. This violates one of the first principals enumerated in The Declaration of Independence.
Looking at it this way, by extension, the unborn child could be protected by The Constitution. A case could be made, that the SCOTUS should stand to give voice to citizens who cannot yet speak for themselves.
The SCOTUS didn’t go that far. I think it would have make an interesting and compelling case…
If they had, then abortions in cases of rape, or incest would have to be denied too.
Reading through The Constitution, there are references to being “Born”. This implies a live birth, and could be construed to mean that an unborn child is not yet protected by The Constitution.
I could see this view too, and wouldn’t be surprised to find this was the reason SCOTUS enabled abortion in 1973. Using this line of reasoning, the woman’s rights would in fact supersede the rights of the unborn child.
This brings the whole issue to the question of, “When does life begin?”
For the founders, life began at birth. The squalling child drinking in those first deep breaths. They knew that a life was growing inside a pregnant woman. But for them the fruition of that growing life was birth.
Our technology has given us deeper insight.
If we could show The Founding Fathers images from inside the womb, if we could show them that still growing babies look human and react if they feel threatened or pain. I’m confident that they’d go back and revise The Constitution to include unborn children.
Some politicians say, “It’s just a clump of cells…” That is true at first. But once those clumps of cells differentiate into brain, heart, eyes, and take on a human appearance. It’s a human being in my book.
I’m confident that The Founding Fathers would be horrified by what the abortion industry has done.
I sure as hell am.
To all those politicians from other countries voicing their opinions about the SCOTUS decision…
Shut the Hell up!
This is our country. Our Constitution.
You have Zero say in how we govern ourselves.
Your input is neither requested or desired.