Something I’ve been considering and was recently asked about.

Voting integrity.

It’s been an issue for literally decades. In the past 15 or 20 years it’s become more of an issue. 

There was a time when the only way to screw with an election was to stuff the ballot box with paper.

With the adoption of electronic voting machines, suddenly paper ballots weren’t that big a deal because electronics are really good at duplicating. 

What happens if you select a ballot with desired characteristics and tell and electronic voting machine to triple the count of the desired ballots. In a way, that would be the hardest malfunction to refute if original paper ballots weren’t available. How do investigators separate fiction from reality.

Let’s assume that I wanted to screw the pooch on a free and fair election. I’d create a random number generator, then I’d set that to collapse and regenerate at random intervals.. The random number would be the length of time that the voting machine was going to duplicate ballots for a particular candidate or select group of candidates.

Because the duplication wouldn’t be the same number every time, and the duplication would be happening at random intervals it would require a complete paper audit to get a real count on a single machine.

Now think what it would be like to have thousands of machines randomly duplicating a random number of ballots. From a software test perspective, these kinds of software glitches were maddening to figure out. 

Believe it or not, it’s possible for software to have something like I’ve described built in by accident. People like me, used to be what stood between the software you used and enjoyed, and software that made you crazy.

If someone were to intentionally program something like this into the voting machines, you’d have a suspicion the vote was being monkeyed with, but proving that assertion would be really difficult without a hand count.

Here’s another nasty thought about this kind of cheating. Because there isn’t any consistency it could be interpreted as spurious (and defined as well within the margin of error,)  causing courts to decide the plaintiff / candidate has “No Standing”.

Hmmm. 


So the question is, how do you ensure that there are no shenanigans in voting?

Well, you can bring technology to the rescue. But that is I think an incomplete solution and lends itself to the very shenanigans you’re trying to stop.

You could use a blockchain solution. You could use a simpler encryption. You could probably use just a simple CRC.

The problem as I see it, isn’t so much the encryption mechanism, the problem tracks back to one vote, one person. That implies that every State would have to  implement voter ID.

Once you implement Voter ID then something like a bunch of fields can be used to create a long string of data as a kind of header.

FNAMELNAMESTREETADDRESSAPTCITYSTATEZIPVOTERIDNUMBER 

464E414D454C4E414D45535452454554414444524553534150544349545953544154455A4950564F54455249444E554D424552C2A0 0x85BB9A40

464E414D454C4E414D45535452454554414444524553534150544349545953544154455A4950564F54455249444E554D424552B2A0 0xAA84E3B6

If you covert that data to numeric equivalents you’ve now got a string of numbers that can have a CRC value calculated.

In the example above, the portion of the data that starts 0x is the CRC. You’ll notice that they’re different. That difference is caused by 1 character being changed. The example was created from the text above the hexadecimal numbers.

Next, is the block of data that contains the actual voter selections. Again, convert this data to a kind of packet. The packet could be as long as needed.

For the sake of argument assume that the entire ballot is represented by binary numbers.

Candidate for office 1

Office – 00000001

Candidate

X – 001

Y – 010

Z – 011

Gives you 0000000100000011 assuming a vote for candidate Z.

Office 2

Office – 00000010

Candidate

X – 001

Y – 010

Z – 011

Gives you 0000001000000010 assuming a vote for candidate Y.

All this results in a string of numbers 00000001000000110000001000000010 that can be CRCed and again if one number is changed the CRC value won’t match. Indicating either tampering or a glitch.

Using a system like this you could easily have 255 issues/offices on one ballot. It’s equally possible to have 255 candidates per issue. This is just using 8 bits “0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0”. If necessary, expansion to 16 bits is easily done.

It’s even possible to have one or more selections to a point. It’s possible to build in checks that invalidate multiple selections per office where only one selection is allowed. In the case of a rejected ballot, you needn’t  review the entire ballot, simply the office(s) where a stray pencil mark may happen.

For the sake of consistency it’s probably best to convert the binary to Hex

The result would look like 01030202 0x4786058E again the 0x is the CRC. 

Then finally, encode the date time, and location the vote was cast. To do this use epoch time. Epoch time is a number that computers use to calculate time internally. Since computers don’t think in Feb 27, 2024 there’s a numeric constant that’s being incremented every second. The starting date is Jan 1, 1970. Now you know why your devices will sometimes reset to that date when they lose power. Nothing magical about it, it’s just an arbitrary date that everybody agreed upon. So the number below represents the number of seconds elapsed since Midnight, Jan 1, 1970 followed by the CRC.

1709058569 0x3A404184

What I’m building here is modeled after a network packet. 

The object in the preamble it’s going to be unique. The vote data might be the same across 1000s of people is added as part of a unique yet retrievable voter record and the date/time, voting location ensures that only the first vote is valid.

If all of these fields were just CRCed. Then any variation or alteration of the data would show up. A CRC mismatch would indicate that the data has been tampered with. If more complex encryption or block chain was used, the security would increase. The question is, do we need that level of security?

Under this off the cuff system, each vote would be a singular event. There would be only one valid vote, any copies would be ignored. The data packet would look something like this:

464E414D454C4E414D45535452454554414444524553534150544349545953544154455A4950564F54455249444E554D424552C2A00x85BB9A40010302020x4786058E17090585690x3A404184

And it would be unique per person. Folks receive a printed receipt that contains a number (as above), possibly a QR code, and their “I Voted Sticker”. Even folks voting on paper or with punch ballots could get a printed receipt easily. They just feed their completed ballot into a scanner as they exit the polling place. The scanner, records the image, produces the numeric data above and generates the checksum. 

Much the same process occurs in a computer network. Packets originate from a specific computer and even specific applications. The origination address makes certain that any response is returned to the proper computer and application. The data block is a defined size, and the time increment makes sure that individual packets can be reassembled into coherent data even if the data is received out of sequence.

There are CRC’s run on the data when it’s transmitted and again on the receiving system. If the CRC fails, the data packet is requested to be sent again.

The trouble is, no matter what system is implemented. Without voter ID in all 50 states the system falls down. 

A system like this also requires that no-one can register and vote on the same day. Registering and voting on the same day is INSANE and ripe for abuse. Everyone knows that, yet there are states that allow it.

Let’s be honest here, do we really want people voting who can’t make enough of a plan to register to vote 2 or 3 months in advance of an election? Voting is kind of like gun ownership, maybe we need a 21 day waiting period!

Another problem with a system as I’ve described is making the data unique to an individual. This begs the question of who votes? Do you allow only United States citizens the right to vote, or do you allow everyone in the country the right to vote? I’m a big believer that only United States citizens should be allowed to vote. I might consider flexibility for those people who are several years along the naturalized citizen pathway.

Voting rights could be granted as a milestone during the naturalization process. I’m aware that often a person working toward citizenship is better informed about this country and our laws than a citizen born here. I’m counting on it, and that the reasons a person chose to come to this country, then chose to work to become a citizen are reasons that will inform their voting choices. The idea is that whatever they left behind does not become the law of this land.

What does this have to do with a voting system as I’ve proposed? It’s about adding another data field that helps with making each vote a unique event.

What I’ve described is just a basic thumbnail sketch of a system. Application of encryption adds more security, and perhaps with a public key / private key scheme, tampering or whatever could be stopped. But everyone would have to have a public/private key pair. Using blockchain adds the same level of complexity. Everyone would have to have something like a blockchain account. How do you manage that?

One way would be to use the “smart” functionality of our passports and encode a key pair or blockchain ID into that chip. Then presenting the passport would unlock the voting process for the individual.

I’ve long been a proponent of every single citizen having a passport. I’ve got a passport and a passport card. I wouldn’t be opposed to presenting a passport, and my driver’s license at a polling place. I wouldn’t mind having to use my thumbprint next to my signature on the ballot, or to access the polling place, or activate a voting machine.

My Mother thinks I’m some kind of fascist for thinking any of the above is okay. She parrots that tired old BS the Democrat party has been peddling for years. “Not Everyone can get an ID. They’re poor, they may not have a birth certificate, it’s tough to navigate the complexities of getting an ID.” 

The last time we spoke about this issue, I asked her, “Okay Mom, then how do these people have bank accounts, buy cars, apply for FEMA when a tornado destroys their trailer park, or apply for welfare? They have to have ID for all of those things.”

I suggested that while my Mother was one of the least racist people I know, she was sounding a whole lot like an old racist Dixiecrat waiting on the sheets to dry for the cross burning that night.

That ended the conversation. 

I’d even be totally willing for any U.S. Citizen to be able to obtain taxpayer funded verified ID. If money wasn’t a roadblock to the poor, then implementation of national voter ID should be a breeze. 

Except… the pushback for a national ID system is enormous and it comes from some of the oddest places.

One of the funniest things I’ve ever participated in was a family reunion discussion that found atheist democrats and religious republicans startled because they both were against national voter ID.

The religious group called it the number of the beast and a sign of the end times. The atheists called it a horrific invasion of privacy and the first step toward a Nazi fascist state.

I was sitting there watching the show, enjoying my beer. 

After both sides appeared to have exhausted themselves, I pointed out that unless they’d moved from one state to another, their driver’s license number was already an ID number that hadn’t changed since they were 16 years old. How big a leap is it to have the feds just used that number as a national ID?

Then I pulled another beer from the cooler.

I’m sometimes an evil fucker. The other half glared at me trying to act angry, then he started chuckling and we both enjoyed the rest of the show.

I can see some of my über liberal friends saying, “what about those people who can’t get to a polling place?” Well, if we have national ID then the polling place can be taken to those people. Their ID grants access to a digital polling pad that’s portable and records their biometrics and their ballot. That pad gets physically plugged into a voting tabulator which verifies the records and either tallies the vote or kicks it out because it’s invalid. 

That puts an end to dead people voting. When you die, your ID along with your credit cards, and bank accounts are closed or at least locked and unusable.

As an aside, when you die… the Social Security Administration is informed pretty damn quick. They in turn send out some kind of notice to the banks and credit card folks. So if one of your loved ones dies, don’t fall for the scumbag banks trying to bully payments out of you. Especially if your name isn’t on the card or line of credit.

Don’t fall for the creditors claiming they weren’t notified of the death. They absolutely had access to that information. It’s probably the one time the misuse of our Social Security Account Numbers works in our favor.What those fuckers are counting on is that in your grief you’ll reaffirm on the line of credit by paying or talking to them about it. If you acknowledge the debt they can fuck you.

Note, if the account, card, or line of credit has your name on it, sorry bucko, you’re still on the hook.

Have you ever really thought about this? Someone asking for your social security number is pretty much the same as them asking for your checking account number or debit card number. So why does the medical system, or banking, or insurance provider, or utility company need your social security number? 

You know why? It’s a unique identifier, kind of like a national ID number. Yeah… Think about that for a minute!

How about this? Ask me for my passport number. It’s more secure, has a photograph of me, and with the new chipped versions they’re going to be really hard to duplicate.

Just a thought…

Is It just me? People seem a lot grumpier after the SOTU address.

Honestly, I thought folks would calm down. But it appears the SOTU address didn’t sit well with a lot more people than the die hard Trump folks.

The GOP response speech was not good. I have no doubt that Katie Britt’s heart is in the right place, but her handlers did her a disservice by telling her to be hyper emotional. She should have stuck to just the facts and direct rebuttal of Biden’s non-sequiturs.

Hell, if she’d called him a liar on national television and backed up her assertions, the nation would have rallied around her and the GOP regardless of how ‘green’ she is as a statesman.

It would have been the first time in the Biden administration that someone spoke that particular truth to power.

Joe Biden is a fucking liar! He always has been. That leopard hasn’t changed its spots one iota over the 40 years the jackass from Delaware has been lying, cheating, and stealing, from the American People.

I’m not angry about it, I’ve thought Biden was a crook since 2020. So none of this is new to my thinking. I’m thankful that I may never have to listen to Joe Biden speak again after November.

That would be a very good thing for me personally. I hated listening to Obama speak, and don’t get me started on Bush! But Biden is by far the worst President in my lifetime, hearing him speak sets my teeth on edge.

When I say that, it’s kind of impressive. That rogues gallery includes, Nixon, Carter, Clinton, Bush 1, Bush the 2nd, and Obama.

I’ll say this, Biden is the most divisive President I’ve ever seen. 

A year or two ago, I had passion in my distaste for Biden. Now, not so much. I feel like entropy is winning as it always must.

The quality of presidents has been declining through the years. Each of my top 6 Presidents has been plagued by scandal one way or another. Even Reagan, who is not in my top 6 list, kind of screwed the Gay community during the AIDS epidemic. Eventually he came around, but only when there was nothing left to lose.

My point is, every single one of these Presidents was able to at least lie their way through a State of the Union and end it with the people at home not feeling like they’d just been dragged to the woodshed by grandpa. We didn’t feel emotionally harangued like we’d done something wrong and didn’t deserve the air we breathed.

Yet all of Biden’s speeches feel like if we disagree or are worried about the direction of our country, somehow WE’RE the bad guys. It doesn’t even matter what party you’re from anymore. 

Here we are on Monday, the speech was on Thursday and there are people still raging about it on Twitter, conservative radio shows, or some TV shows, the podcasts are flat out insane. 

Maybe it’s just that the time change has fueled the “grumpy” and that people went into the weekend pissed off, in the first place.

I’m hoping that folks will calm down. In the meantime, I’m not looking at the news.

I hate it when I’m like this.

I’ve been writing… I try to write every morning over the first cup of coffee. Okay maybe the second and third cups too.

The trouble is, as I’m writing multiple thoughts collide and then the post sort of falls apart. 

A way to visualize the problem is watch a zipper as it’s closing. The left and right halves would represent two distinct trains of thought in my head, then you run the closure mechanism up the zipper and both trains are merged. 

That works great for a zipper but when you’re writing it creates a mess. If you have a few trains of thought running in your head at the same time what you end up with is a really bad train wreck.

There have been a number of train wrecks over the past few weeks.

I’ve written about Leticia James, Donald Trump, women gloating, why I think female to male transgenders can’t pass as men, and why I think the Biden regime is being run by women or man bun wearing soy boys who are weak & annoying.

Sometimes when I have a train wreck in my head I’ll just copy out the train wreck point and create another post that stands on its own merit.

Oh there was also a piece bemoaning the loss of meritocracy.

Anyhow…

That hasn’t worked very well lately. I’m thinking the trouble is in everything being so intertwined.

Here’s an example: 

Trump was being a whiney little bitch about losing 2020 for the past 3 almost 4 years. Had the Biden regime not weaponized the legal system against Trump, I think Trump would have faded into history and lost to another conservative presidential candidate. That’s because the Biden Regime moved too far left too fast and the correction is going to be Biden is a one term president. People in general are or were tired of Trump and all the drama. However the Biden Regime behaved like a woman in a divorce and couldn’t just let things settle. They needed vengeance. It wasn’t solely the Biden regime, it was the entire Democrat party. They’re still pissed off that Hillary lost in 2016 and they’re willing to punish Trump and the American people for 8 -12 years for that heinous “betrayal”. It’s analogous to the way women hold onto their anger in an argument. Instead of putting a stake in the heart of the monster known as Donald Trump, Biden and the Democrat party effectively fed him virgins blood. Now each trial, each indictment, each bloviating buffoon of a Mayor, Governor, District Attorney, Attorney General or Special Prosecutor makes Donald Trump stronger than ever before.

If you read that paragraph there’s a lot to unpack!

Yes, I’m not a big fan of Trump. I’ll vote for him for no other reason than he’s the better of the options available.

I think the Democrat party is behaving like a bunch of bitter women who want their pound of flesh no matter the cost. That’s a major problem for the nation.

I think that Trump lost much of his dignity by bitching and moaning for the past four years about 2020. I lost respect for him because of his inability to lose with some shred of good grace. After 6 months or so, he should have shut the fuck up. Honestly, if he’d “Gone Dark” then exploded on the Presidential campaign scene say in Jan of 2024 he might have avoided all the legal bullshit.

Biden’s presidency has been the most filthy administration since Nixon. I literally hate every single aspect of the Biden Regime top to bottom. I would dance a jig if the lot of them were tossed into prison cells awaiting trial for treason. I call them a regime because there is no honor in this Presidency. The will of the people, and the good of the people has been subverted by the Biden Regimes greed and lust for power. 

I have grown increasingly angry at the justice system, starting with their refusal to hear cases regarding voter fraud. Not for Trumps sake, but for the sake of our Republic. By not hearing the cases, the judiciary has effectively countenanced voter fraud. But then it goes further. Every case brought against Trump, every alteration in the law to allow Trump to be tried for whatever, demonstrates that the country I love and believe in, doesn’t exist. I don’t know if that country ever existed but I’m really pissed that my illusions have been shattered.

Lastly, there’s a fair bit of misogyny in there because I point out women’s behavior in divorces and their preternatural ability to hold onto anger and vengeance (look at Nancy Pelosi!). That line of thinking leads to my exploring why female to male transgenders might pass as men visually, but fail to pass emotionally.

So gentle readers, that’s why the blog posting has been spotty recently. 

My multiple trains of thought have been about as controllable as psychotic horses running into a burning barn.

It’s going to take some time to work through it. Your patience is appreciated.

Well There’s my problem!

I was reading… Scanning headlines as I often do and a headline caught my attention.

The Headline was something like Russia sanctions nuclear weapons in Belarus. I thought “Great!” A few less nuclear weapons in the world is probably a good thing.

Then I read the article a little further, and found that Russia was allowing weapons to be deployed in Belarus. 

Hmmm. 

But we impose sanctions on Iran to keep them from doing shit that nobody likes.

To the dictionary Boy Blunder!!!

Oh hell no!

This word has no fucking meaning at all does it?

As a Noun it could be a penalty or permission, as a verb it’s the same.

Why does this word even exist?

No wonder there are pallets of cash and uranium being moved around to our enemies. 

They wrote the agreements using a word that is as two faced as Janus. (Look it up…)

I don’t want to hear this word being bandied about by journalist, politicians, or anyone else ever again! I’m putting this word in my official “Weasel Word collection”. This collection is my personal list of words not to use, and words that when others use them are red flags that the person is lying to my face.


I was looking for references to Russia threatening to Nuke Berlin, DC, and a couple of other cities if the west really threw in to ensure Ukraine won the war.

This seemed to me to be something of interest. While I’d caught the headline, I didn’t have time or inclination to read something that would very probably depress me. 

Then happily, I remembered that I am a child of the 1960’s. I grew up living under the imminent threat of nuclear annihilation during the Cold War. 

Nukes! Smooks! Bring it on bitches!!!! I remember how to duck and cover!

Although I must admit I might be inclined to send Putin a box of chocolates if he nuked DC.

That would solve a number of problems at once. Crime… Homelessness… Shitty Government…

Ahh there’s the piece…

Russia Will Drop ‘Entire Arsenal’ on London, Washington if it Doesn’t Win Ukraine War

It’s a Breitbart piece. It looks like Medvedev was saber rattling for the folks at home. I wondered why none of the talking heads were breathlessly telling us this was a result of Tucker Carlson interviewing Putin. 

Apparently they didn’t believe the threat was credible. 

The media and others say Tucker Carlson is now a traitor… Yawn. He’s the puppet of Putin… Sigh. He’s a useful idiot to Putin… Whatever.

There was a time when a real journalist would interview Jesus and then Satan just to present both sides of the story. Carlson in my opinion did what any decent journalist would have done. He seized an opportunity to go directly to the source.

We’ve heard all kinds of stuff from Zelensky, personally I wanted to hear from Putin in his own words.

Putin may possibly be a bit crazy, but he’s not senile and infirm like our president. 

The Russian guards in dress uniforms looked a bit odd. It was like they didn’t want to risk eye contact with Putin but still needed to watch over him. They looked uncomfortable performing their task. I wonder if that’s a traditional holdover from the days of the Tsar. There’s something in my memory about not meeting the eye of the emperor or king because mere commoners weren’t equal to the emperor.

I’ll have to look it up, refresh my memory.

Anyway that’s enough randomness for this morning. Time to get breakfast, then walk the K9. Spring is around the corner and Im planning on talking to the realtor mid March.

Too Conservative for California…

Adam Schiff continuing to hammer away on Steve Garvey with that tag line started me thinking.

In the latest ad, it looks like Schiff has updated the attack on Garvey to include the other two democrats running against Schiff.

I thought it was an odd tactic. Schiff is portraying a unified wall of Democrats against the lone conservative Republican. I wondered if this might not backfire in a couple of ways.

1) Americans in general love an underdog.  We also used to love baseball. Especially in Garvey’s time. 

2) Schiff’s ad with the tagline “Too Conservative for California” and Democrats lined up against Garvery making his choice to vote for Trump sound like a crime. Who cares if Garvey voted for Trump? What does that matter? That Schiff’s ad uses Garvey’s voting history as it does, embodies perfectly why I personally have felt like I need to get out of California for years.

I too am “Too Conservative for California” 

I’ve felt more and more unwelcome in California. A place I spent all of my adult life in. A place where I worked hard, and with my partner carved out a bit of the American dream. I naively believed that California would always feel welcoming and like a place of opportunity.

California has become very Judgmental, on a personal level. 

I remember when it was okay to discuss politics and not have the discussion devolve into an argument and hurt feelings. I remember a time when Democrat and Republican / Liberal and Conservative could actually have a discussion where both sides listened to the nuance of the points being discussed.

Now, expressing a non-sanctioned or unapproved opinion can get you thrown out of a bar or restaurant or worse. Walk into a public place and declare you’re Pro-Life and anti “transing” a child under 18. See what happens, you might want to make sure your health and life insurance are paid up…

Democrats agree.Seeing the image of Porter, Lee, and Schiff, with a tag line, something like Democrats Agree, Garvey is not right for California, really crystallized the issue.

California actively HATES anyone with a different opinion. California HATES the individual, the business person, the farmer, and even the entrepreneur. 

California demonstrates that hatred with the ubiquitous high taxation, fees, regulations, and business tax prepayment requirements. Then the State of California continues to demonstrate its contempt for its citizens with a deficit budget, lawlessness, and spending in ways that do not help the citizens of California or the United States, for that matter.

Adam Schiff, in producing this ad might have told the truth for the first time in his career, albeit inadvertently.

Adam Schiff and the Democrat party of California are inviting any and all  Conservatives to leave.

There’s no winning against these Democrats. I think all conservatives and Republicans should simply stop trying.

It’s time to let California go. 

Eventually even the farmers will be driven out. Rest assured, California will enact regulations that prevent ranching, and farming at scale. California will try to implement the “Green” policies that European Farmers have been protesting for at least the last year. 

The Central Valley Famers don’t have the numbers to stand up against the Dazzling Urbanites of the Coastal cities. The farmers can’t win a vote for better government in California. They don’t have the voting numbers to break away from the dank denizens of the Coastal homeless and open air sewage encampments.

California has also mastered the art and weaponization of regulation.

Regulations are not laws, they’re not subject to the same scrutiny as a law. Regulations, nonetheless can have the power of law. The issue is that regulations are concocted by unelected bureaucrats hidden in office warrens and cubicle farms. They have no accountability and never directly see or feel the effects of their regulation. These bureaucrats don’t ever concern themselves with the question of a regulation working as intended, so long as the fee from that regulation keeps being collected. 

As a result of regulation, I’ve allowed my yard to look like the surface of the moon. At one time, my yard was in bloom from spring through fall. I had all the colors of California. It was work that I enjoyed. Walking into the yard always made me smile. Jerry would keep an eye on me and call me in for a drink of water and rest about every hour or so, because I’d get lost in what I was doing and forget things like drinking or eating. My weekends were pleasurable and happy.

That was all before the county decided to “protect” us with inspections backed up with fines that if left unpaid, would result in liens on our property and county contractors showing up to clear our property of offensive plants. These contractors have the ability to charge double or triple their normal rate, they bill the county who passes the charge along to the property owner with interest accruing monthly. 

I got tired of the county sending “Inspectors” who knew nothing about native plants indigenous to the area, coming up onto my property and fining me for planting and maintaining, flowering, drought resistant, landscaping.

Oh and these “Inspectors” were on par with every fucking ‘Karen’ I’ve ever encountered in an HOA! After a while, I simply got tired of fighting with them.

Each year, it was the same shit, I was sending photos and plant identification of the California Natives and writing dissertation after dissertation explaining that these plants were not fire hazards, they were in fact far enough away from the structure, they were drought resistant and therefore ecologically responsible.

But we all know how “Karens” are… They can never be wrong! Their opinions and beliefs are absolutely and always correct. I’d no sooner win one battle, then the Karen’s would change the rules to “prove” they were right and I was wrong.

There came a year when I looked at Jerry and asked if just let the yard die, would he be okay with it. He said, “Yep”. He was just as tired of the bullshit as I was.

I simply didn’t turn on the irrigation system that year. Any plant that dared to sprout, I cut down with the weed whacker. The Karens from the county fined us to clean up some pine needles that weren’t on our property.

My response was a letter back to them, stating that I’d already plowed under all the California natives on my property thereby devaluing the property tax assessment and informing them that if they chose to make me responsible for other properties, I would use my chainsaw to cut down every single tree on my property and surrounding properties to make them stop harassing us.

I don’t think my letter had nearly the impact of the letter one of Jerry’s attorney friends sent.

All we ever wanted was to live in a pretty place have a nice yard, small garden, look up at the stars at night, and be left the fuck alone. But regulation and regulators, needed to be made and employed didn’t they?

I chose to be 70 miles away from LA and Orange County to AVOID HOA fuckwads. I was successful with the damn HOAs but Jerry and I couldn’t avoid the damn California bureaucrats. Nor could we avoid fighting with the county for almost 20 years over their flood control people destroying the road in front of the house, and destroying the environment in and around the wash.

Now that I’m contemplating selling the place, I’ll buy some cheap plants that won’t survive the summer, pretty the place up, collect the proceeds from the sale and head for California’s border. I don’t think I’ll be looking back either.

California may well be the state closest to a full communism regime in the United States. The state is not quite there but if you ask yourself dangerous questions like;

“What do I really get for my investment of taxes, and fees?”

“Is my family any safer?”

“Are the roads better?”

“Can I walk or drive the streets of major cities in the state without fear of being victimized?”

“How long does it take for police to get to my home? “

“How long does it take for paramedics to get to my home? “

“How long does it take for me to see a doctor at an Urgent care or Emergency Room?”

“Why does it take the time it does? What state policies impact any of these issues?”

If you ask those questions and do not immediately leap to “The solution is more government” Then you’re probably not welcome in California.

Hate to tell you this, but you’ve been contaminated by conservative thoughts… It’s only a matter of time before you start asking other questions. 

“Do these elected officials represent me or my community’s best interests?”

“Why do I find my fellow Californians and / or Democrats so annoying lately?”

“Why don’t I like being at rallies for leftist causes anymore?”

Contrary to popular leftist / Democratic dogma. Asking these questions does not automatically mean you’ll be seeking to join the nearest Neo Nazi party. Trust me you’ll not be doing Nazi Salutes or be drinking the MAGA Koolaid from Trumps dick.

It means that you’re actually doing a cost / benefit analysis and realizing that it’s coming up short. The % of your income given to government does not equal the value returned by the government.  Oh you’ll realize it’s not just the state of California, it’s the federal government too. 

You’ll simply understand that by leaving California where conservatives are not wanted, you’ll be able to dial down the % of your income taken from you from which you derive no benefit. You’ll essentially be able to focus on fighting ONLY the taxation and wasteful spending of the Federal Government.

I suppose I should thank Googly eyes Schiff for clarifying the position of the DNC in California. 

They’re saying “GET OUT! We don’t want your kind here…” 

Message received!