I’ve made a decision regarding California Mobile Driver’s Licenses.

Once they become available, I’m going to go ahead and load it.

The government, for a variety of reasons knows who I am. Since I’m a pretty stable individual and haven’t changed addresses or phone numbers for at least a decade It’s highly likely whatever information associating my Driver’s license and phone would give the state or Federal government will be redundant.

In addition to the TSA check in, potentially a bar with reader technology carding me, (I’d be so overjoyed at being carded at my age I’d probably have a heart attack,) there is one other oblique reference I’ve seen and I don’t know what they’re meaning.

Some of the literature makes reference to age verifications on websites and as required for purchases. This implies to me that the data might be requested by certain sites. This would negate having to make a photo copy of your Driver’s license then email it to someone you don’t know. I’ve always hated having to assume that they’re going to handle the data properly and delete the copy of the driver’s license when it’s no longer necessary. The implication is that somehow the relevant data only, will be presented to the requestor thereby minimizing security risks.

I have a real problem when medical facilities, or insurance companies, or banks make copies of my social security card and driver’s license. I’ve said often to these people their procedure is just begging for fraud and id theft. In recent years a number of medical office breaches have proven my point.

It’s possible that the digital ID could curb or at least add a stumbling block to ID theft and I’m all for that.

I have no idea what sites they’re talking about. I’ll perhaps try looking at an adult site first.

Funny thing about adult sites, is that their security is pretty damn impressive and they are also among the first folks to adopt new technology.

My adoption of this technology may, (likely will,) result in nothing much different in my daily, weekly, or even yearly life. It might be that until a substantial number of states adopt the technology it will largely be a nothing burger.

Additionally, should I leave California, there are very few states that have adopted the technology that I’d choose to move to.

Based on the current list, Ohio? They don’t have a lot of favorable policies towards retired folks. So it’s likely that I’ll have it, then lose it.

Maybe Arizona? That would depend on where. Phoenix is right out. Flagstaff? Wilson? I’m not 100% convinced, but trying to keep an open mind.


Update: Apologies!  I just found out that Auto correct isn’t working in the Title Field in my blogging application.

Here’s one of those weird things I notice occasionally

As I’ve mentioned, this whole driver’s license and ID thing in your phone fascinates me.

In August it was announced the California would “Soon” be joining the ranks of digital ID capable states. 

What didn’t get a whole lot of play was that Ohio brought the functionality online a few weeks earlier. 3-4 days ago Hawaii enabled the functionality with little fanfare at all.

So as of this writing, there are six states whose ID’s can be stored and presented via Apple Wallet.

Looking at the digital representations of the IDs is kind of neat.

It might be that the digital licenses are better looking than the documents they’re intended to represent.

I stumbled across Hawaii being in the list, completely by accident and then wondered how that happened.

There have been no IOS updates over the past few days, so the addition of any of these IDs appears to be independent of the base OS.

This leads me to think there’s some kind of switch that can be turned on without a full update. Which begs the question, just how connected is my phone to Apple?

They talk about privacy and security but if something like this can be enabled transparently I wonder what else can be enabled… Or disabled behind the scenes without the phone or OS mentioning that there’d been a change.

This also suggests that California’s addition to the participating states could be done independently of an IOS update too.

Previously, I thought that states were added to the “Allowed” list via “Point” updates to the IOS and they’d require the user to allow the download and installation of an IOS update.

Yet clearly that is not the case.

I’m not sure how I feel about that.

I suppose in reality nothing has changed. Apple still has control over the device just as they always have, the difference now is that I’m perhaps a bit more aware of their technological leash.

There’s another thing that I found interesting.

With the exception of Ohio. Every single one of these states, has something in common. They’re all deep Blue States politically.

Even Arizona, though I know there are people who’d vehemently disagree, is a Blue State these days.

California, a deep Blue State will soon be added to the list.

I don’t think it’s anything other than an oddity, a coincidence if you will. But it makes me wonder.

According to Apple and several news articles I’ve been able to dig up, there are other states looking into allowing digital ID’s.

In 2022 Apple said there were six states that would soon allow digital licenses. These States were;

Connecticut, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma, & Utah.

To date none of these states have proceeded with the project. Kentucky for example says “Soon” but has been saying that since 2022. The other states either say in the future or are non committal about it.

With the exception of Connecticut, these states are all Red States.

So I’m wondering if the difference is a matter of political, or religious leaning. Might it be conservatives worried about the intrusiveness of technology on every aspect of our lives, or do these Red States know or suspect something I’m missing.

Google got there first.

Apple Wallet California state ID hero_inline.jpg.large_2x.Google Wallet is now supporting California mDL as of today Friday, 8/23/2024

mDL (Mobile Drivers Licenses)

I’m still not sure exactly where, “there” is. Sure, Google beat Apple to the punch but honestly so what?

There’s an article from FoxLA that largely says nothing…

California driver’s license now available to add to Google Wallet

It again reiterates the TSA piece at selected airports. But doesn’t really say much about other benefits of having your driver’s license in your phone versus your wallet. Especially since you still have to carry the physical Driver’s License.

Again… The point?

Sure it’s neat but so what?

What benefit does this provide to the actual user?

Student ID use cases seem to be more beneficial.

Some colleges allow the students to have their Student ID on their phone which grants the students access to dorms, libraries, cafeterias, and other on campus amenities.

Some corporations in addition to Apple are putting their employee IDs on phones which eliminates the annoying lanyards with your ID dangling and if you’re a tech, getting in your way constantly as you access machines. In this case the ID on the phone opens doors and eliminates a whole bunch of problems with leaving your ID card in your car, or having the ID card lost or stolen because you dropped it when you meant to shove it in your pocket.

A lot of companies have polices about not wearing your corporate ID outside the corporate campus. This is particularly true of aerospace companies.

I can see the student ID and Employee ID and their immediate utility. Thus far, the benefit of my Drivers License on my phone, escapes me. Perhaps it wouldn’t, if I flew more.

Being able to validate my alcohol purchase at the grocery store in a self checkout line would be useful. Not having to tell the pharmacist my date of birth and name when I pick up a prescription would be useful. But neither of those cases are remotely available at this time.

Congrats to Google for getting there first in California. Good for you guys. 

But what now?