Wait, What? I know she’s unhinged but What???

I’m including the text of the story, and the link to the original story here

Maxine Waters: If Trump Wins in November There Will Be Violence, More Killings

By PAM KEY 23 Jun 2024

Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) said on this week’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “The Saturday Show” that if former President Donald Trump wins in November, there will be violence and “more killings.”

Host Jonathan Capehart asked, “How concerned are you about your safety if Donald Trump is re-elected?”

Waters said, “I’m very concerned, not only about my safety and not only about the safety of members of Congress. I’m concerned about the safety of so many people in this country, particularly people of color. Donald Trump has said that if he does not win, it is going to be fraud, and because it is going to be fraud, there will be blood in the streets. He threatens about a civil war, and he threatens there’s going to be violence. I would say all of this talk is motivational with many of those who are racist, who are sitting at home listening to him, and they are taking him up on his threats even before the elections take place. It is about thousands, maybe millions of people being threatened and being at risk because of Donald Trump and his desire to seek revenge on anything and everybody.”

She added, “I do believe having listened to Donald Trump so many times and having the attack, the insurrection that took place on the House of Representatives in Congress, on the Capitol, the Capitol grounds, we could be in for more killings like that. I think Donald Trump has to take responsibility for what he is saying about blood in the streets and violence if he is not elected to be the president of the United States of America.”

Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN

What? 

In answer to the question, she says there will be violence if Trump wins & she’s afraid of Trump winning. Later on Mad Maxine says that if he doesn’t win and claims fraud there will be violence.

Can I infer from her world view that no matter what, there’s going to be violence? If so, might I ask who will be calling the shots on the violence?

Mad Maxine has openly called for violent actions on at least one occasion and there’s video to back up that claim. Trump on the other hand hasn’t actually called for violence, if you bother to listen to his words.

However Trump’s enemies continue to claim that he’s called for and incited violence.

Obviously they’re taking that directly from the Joseph Goebbels playbook. I’d bet that the majority of youngsters in the streets protesting about whatever they’re protesting about in this particular hour of the day have no idea who Joseph Goebbels was, so they’re going to repeat the mistakes of the past.

People like Mad Maxine on the other hand are old enough to know that name, in her case I’d bet she’s too ignorant to have learned anything about him in school.

Mad Maxine chooses to miss the point in her fear mongering. Donald Trump isn’t calling for blood in the streets, he’s warning about blood in the streets because he might be accurately judging the mood of the American People.

An awful lot of people believe that the elections were rigged. More evidence has come to light that in fact the elections were not as safe and secure as previously advertised. Recently evidence has come to light that suggests Biden could actually have lost the election in terms of votes in a couple of swing states.

The folks who were denigrated and called conspiracy theorists, who were told that their concerns and even evidence were of no consequence, and who were denied due process in the courts because “They Had No Standing” are rightfully pissed off.

Pissed off enough that they might legitimately see overthrow of a corrupt government as the only option left to them.

On the other side of the coin, you’ve got BLM, ANTIFA, and god only knows what else. For all we know at this point, we could have Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaida, and any number of other groups that hate the United States standing by, on the Joe Biden side.

Not that they like Biden, but since Biden is weak and ineffective. It makes sense for them to keep Biden in office, because 4 more years of zero consequences to terrorist organizations, or flat out criminals would be just freakin awesome for them.

Thinking it through, Mad Maxine might be 100% correct. 

No matter who wins the election in November. Blood will flow in the streets.

It would be very ironic if we had another January 6th thrown by BLM & ANTIFA. It might be funny to watch the pundits and wags lose their minds trying to defend those groups burning down The Capital.

I suppose what caught my attention was the dissonance in Mad Maxine’s response.

It’s like 24/7 she is terrified of a boogie man called Trump. I suspect that she’s also terrified of the discord and racial animus she and others have helped to create. She’s possibly wondering how the heck she’s going to avoid getting caught up in the reconciliation (the point when both sides realize they’ve been used).

Historically, when people at the bottom of creating societal divides and violent hatred are identified, they don’t live happily ever after, or very long for that matter.

I doubt that Mad Maxine has the intellectually capacity to understand that lesson. Remember, even a worm has survival instincts. Mad Maxine may not understand the threat she’s facing, but she may have enough awareness to feel some unseen danger stalking her.

Existential THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!!!!!

Oh for god’s sake STOP!

Global Warming, Is a threat to democracy
Global Cooling, Is a threat to democracy
MAGA, Is a threat to democracy
Trump, Is a threat to democracy
Vaccine Hesitancy, Is a threat to democracy
Israel Palestine conflict, Is a threat to democracy
January 6th Protests, Is a threat to democracy
Questioning the media, Is a threat to democracy
Questioning the Government, Is a threat to democracy

If everything the media and politicians warn us about, Is a threat to democracy, then nothing is.

Alternatively, if everything is a threat to democracy then democracy is some seriously weak assed shit.

Neither of these assertions are particularly correct.

What these morons are saying is anything and everything beyond their control is a threat to their idea of democracy.

Which leads me to wonder if they understand what democracy is, or that if used incorrectly, democracy may be a bad thing.

You want to see true unfettered absolute democracy?

Look at the Pro Palestinian protestors on college campuses preventing other students from getting to & from their classes. Is this not The Majority exercising absolute democracy and using their numbers to overrule the rights of a minority?

How about Pro Palestinian protestors interrupting a pride parade? Aside from the multiple ironies of Queers for Palestine being on both sides of the “battle line”. Protestors versus Pride Parade is absolute RAW Democracy in action. (There’s also a lesson in there. With Palestinians we can’t have anything they don’t want us to have.)

Democracy can easily be used to trample the rights of the individual. 

That’s why The Constitution and Bill of Rights are so important. When you understand those documents are the only thing standing between us and Pure Democracy (a.k.a. tyranny of the mob), the importance of these documents appears in a whole new light.

I’ve come to believe that the media and our politicians are overusing the word democracy so that we stop “hearing it”. Much like the overused word “racist”. I’ve started wondering if this is a prelude to redefining the word to mean something else in practice if not actual definition.

We don’t now and never have lived in a democracy. Our form of government was designed as a Constitutional Republic. That design was chosen so that the rights of the individual would be preserved regardless of the desires of the Mob.

There’s also an interesting bit in The Constitution that says something to the effect, rights not enumerated are assumed to be held or retained by the individual, not the state. I’m paraphrasing but the meaning was clear to me as an 11 or 12 year old.

My right to do as I pleased was enshrined in The Constitution…

To be clear, my parents were pleased and impressed that I’d read and comprehended The Constitution. They did not however buy my assertion that my misbehavior was Constitutionally protected. I recall their rebuttal was completely rational.

You live in our house, as a dependent on our largess, therefore you will obey our rules until such time as you are no longer dependent upon us for food and shelter. Now, GO TO YOUR ROOM!

It wasn’t until many years later that I learned my Father’s face had been beet red not out of anger, as I had supposed at the time. He’d been doing one of the hardest things a parent has to do. Being parental, when what he really wanted to do was bust up laughing. He told me in my 30’s that he & my mother had gone out to the driveway and laughed till they cried.

I can say these days, it’s a good thing my Father is dead, much as I miss him. With the way the government has been doing things over the past decade or two, my Brother is convinced, and I concur, that our Father would have been out in the shed or in a bunker making ammo and planning for “La Revolution!”

He’d have seen his planning as duty to The Founding Documents, in particular that part that says if the government has become so corrupt and distorted that it no longer serves the people, then the people should overthrow it.

Even in the 1970’s I remember my Father saying that the government should be “big red switched”. A.K.A. abolished and restarted from The Bill of Rights, Constitution, and basic principals. His thinking was that for 1 hour or day there’d be no laws whatsoever. He was ahead of his time. He was really talking about something similar to “The Purge”.

His thinking was that you have to re-elect all new officials, all the laws get erased. The government got started up again with the basics of commonly accepted laws. Don’t kill, don’t steal, that sort of thing. He figured that any scores that got settled while the government was restarting and laws being re-adopted was probably acceptable losses. He’d sometimes go a bit further saying that the folks who got taken out during the restart, probably would have deserved it.

Funny thing, now that I think about it. I wouldn’t consider my Father and his somewhat radical ideas a threat to The Republic. But I could see how his ideas would be considered a threat to the “Democracy” that our politicians are trying to defend.

I’d hate to be worried about my Father and the rest of the family getting “Ruby Ridged” or “Wacoed” by the Feds. There was a time when I called those incidents “outlier” events. Now, I’ve begun to see the Feds for what they are. They’ve shown us all exactly who and what they are in the past 4 years. 

When things like the following have become common place:

3am raids against lawyers who represented a political enemy.
Hunting down people who were simply at the capital on Jan 6th.
Kicking down the doors of ministers over a political dispute with weapons drawn and children in the house.
10-15 vehicles with 60+ agents of the FBI in full tactical load out to arrest one 65 year old retiree and his wife.

Really? This is the “Democracy” our politicians are screaming about protecting?

I’ve seen old newsreels of this. Jackbooted authoritarian thugs kicking down doors.

It was common in Soviet Russia, we denounced it then. It is common in Communist China, our politicians seem to be looking the other way these days. We also saw this behavior in 1930s & 1940s Germany. While the Hugo Boss uniforms were impressive, the authoritarianism was not, and we saw millions murdered. At the end of that conflict. When the trials were ongoing, the common refrain was “I was only following my orders.”

We’ve already heard testimony before Congress that sounded a lot like, “I was only following orders.”

If this kind of government is what our politicians, specifically those in high offices want to protect, then we have a serious problem. 

The question is, how radical will the solution to the problem have to be?

This is the best they’ve got?

Michale Cohen.So the best New York can throw against Trump is a Felon, Serial Liar, Disbarred Attorney, who admits that he embezzled funds from Trump?

New York put this kind of insanity in front of a Jury expecting them to side with the state of New York against Trump for what amounts to, at worst an accounting error? 

That accounting error was in a payment or payments to the aforementioned Felon while he was acting as Trumps attorney? 

What the FUCK?

This guy has got to be the dumbest fuck ever!

He’s apparently made s few million dollars writing disparaging books about Trump as well and now we hear from this moron’s own lips that he’s an embezzler. And he’s stupid enough to have admitted it in a court of law.

I swear, lock this guy up and throw away the fucking key.

Plus he apparently took a whole series of actions without Trumps knowledge regarding the Stormy Daniels shit. Including mortgaging his own house to pay Stormy Daniels off. Really? This guy really needs to hear his own testimony, maybe then he’d understand why there was no place in Trumps administration for him.

Wow!