Bank of America shows us something important.

Pexels steve pancrate Bank of America 640x480.This week Bank of America had some kind of outage that resulted in an unknown number of their customers having their bank accounts zeroed out.

My personal and business Bank of America accounts were wiped to $0.00 in this alleged cyber attack,” Elijah Schaffer, a journalist with Gateway Pundit

Elijah Schaffer is a fairly well known conservative reporter and the host of the “Slightly Offensive with Elijah Schaffer” podcast.

Thus far I’ve not seen any numbers of how many BofA customers experienced this problem.

The number was apparently large enough that their customer service phone lines were overwhelmed and would answer, say they couldn’t talk, then hang up.

This points to the fragility of a cashless society, in general. It also points to something potentially more sinister.

In recent years there has been a push from some quarters to have specialized categorizations added to VISA, MasterCard, American Express, & other cards.

For the time being these categorizations appear to be limited specifically to firearms.

So while Federal and State governments say they’re not in favor of a nationwide firearms database.

These categorizations allow Federal and State governments to have a backdoor into being able to identify someone who either has guns, (registered or not, because grandaddies rifle or six shooter is probably not registered, and doesn’t NEED to be,) who may have purchased  bullets, accessories, or even hats displaying firearms logos… or who may just have an interest in guns.

Categorizations are way better than a firearms database. With a firearms database, someone has to have purchased a firearm, or specifically chosen to register a weapon.

Ever changing laws regarding which firearms need to be registered, what doesn’t, what is legal in this state or that state and what isn’t, and that a gun or a magazine purchased last year was legal then but now isn’t legal, have gone a long way toward criminalizing average citizens.

It’s really all about creating enough legislation such that anyone, at anytime, at the convenience of whatever government or state official, can be charged for illegally possessing something that some other asshole who’s never seen or fired a gun in real life decided was too dangerous to exist.

All of which brings me to my point. 

Select, apparently random Bank of America customers have suddenly, inexplicably, had their bank accounts zeroed out. Since many banking customers have their credit cards through the same bank their checking & savings accounts are with, categorizations could literally be used to punish individuals that government entities find offensive.

Think about it. You expect your direct deposit paycheck to be accessible. You expect your debit card to work. You expect your credit card to work. What happens when you offend a government official and they order your accounts frozen?

The IRS, for years has used this power to screw citizens. The IRS was granted the power to freeze accounts in an effort to curtail drug and human trafficking. But they, more often than not, use it to make sure a mom & pop business owner and their family goes hungry.

Obama used the IRS to punish organizations which opposed him. Folks in these organizations  spent years and thousands of dollars defending themselves against Obama’s IRS. Some of them are only recently cleared of wrongdoing. But the IRS is under no obligation to pay these people back for their legal expenses.

How much easier would it have been for Obama DOJ to punish everyone who donated to organizations he didn’t like with a conference call to VISA, MasterCard, & American Express?

Creating categorizations allows for very specific targeting of large groups who have one or two charges in common. 

For example, everyone who’s ever purchased a firearm or bullet. How about anyone who’s purchased a ticket to a Trump rally?

We know that Biden’s DOJ used charge records to identify January 6th attendees. Some of those people were later classified as January 6th rioters and arrested. Many of whom are still incarcerated awaiting trial almost 4 years later.

Over time, computers could narrow it down to categorizations of individual products. Don’t like cigarettes? Cancel people’s accounts who buy them. Don’t like a particular corporation, destroy them through their clients. No one will buy a corporation’s products if doing so results in being unable to buy food.

It’s far more efficient than the IRS having to target individuals or organizations. Subpoenas and all the constitutional protections that the IRS has to step over, through, or around, become a thing of the past.

Simply looking at commonalities between members of a group would allow correlation and targeting. Eventually, I could see the focus narrowed to individual SKU numbers. I’d bet it could be done today with the right databases and a bit of creativity.

I know this sounds like a dystopian fantasy, but believe me when I say it’s possible. This is what people mean when they talk about social credit scores, if you believe this kind of control can’t or won’t be implemented here in the United States you’ve got a shock coming. There are a number of congressional folks from both parties who approve of elements of this but don’t see the bigger picture.

Which leads me to wonder, was the Bank of America “Glitch” really a cyber attack, or was it a proof of concept demonstration?

Anti-Misinformation Laws be damned – I’m calling this one out.

Kamala Harris finally visited the Southern Border. Yipee! I’m so impressed!

That’s insulting enough, Yet to add to insult, during her short visit which was obviously nothing more than a photo op, she managed to speachify.

Then she blamed the border troubles on Trump.

Excuse me, you lying slut!?!? (My opinion of her. I have no definitive proof of the latter, the nation can observe ample evidence of the former every time she opens her mouth.)

How the hell can she blame Trump for the border issues? I’m honestly surprised she wasn’t struck by a bolt of lightning.

As a Senator, she criticized Trump’s policies, and she criticized the border wall as ineffective. Siding with illegal immigrants against the American People.

As Vice President, she stood by as President Biden literally dismantled Trump policies that were arguably working and at least having some control over illegal immigration.

She, like President Biden, accused Texas Border Patrol of whipping illegal immigrants from horseback without evidence, without knowing the full story, and oh, by the way ignoring that the person who took the fucking pictures was telling them, “Border Patrol did not, and was not, whipping the illegals.” Truth didn’t matter then and I suspect hasn’t mattered in the Administration ever.

She stood by while Mayorkas destroyed the careers and livelihood of Texas Border Patrol officers with an investigation that dragged on for months keeping the officers either at reduced duty and pay or suspended entirely.

She stood by while the Texas Border Patrol’s equestrian unit was effectively dismantled. Then criticized when more illegals were drowning in the Rio Grande than before.

She and the administration facilitated the discount sale of border wall materials which the taxpayer had already paid for, to other countries. 

She and the administration sued Texas & Arizona when both parties set up barriers to protect their borders and the sovereign borders of the United States. 

She was appointed border Czar. (There are recordings and news articles calling her that, so yes it Fucking happened!) Damn I hate being lied to, (I know the polite term is gaslit… We’re well past being polite!)

As border Czar she literally visited the border once but jet setted around looking for underlying causes of illegal immigration.

Anyone could have told her the underlying causes were A) Failed governments B) Failed Law Enforcement in these folks country of origin C) Criminal Gangs D) The profitability of drug and human trafficking (because there was an open border to America) E) A very likely possibility that enemies of the United States were staging bad actors within our borders to further destabilize our nation.

That right there, is common sense it was literally all over the various news media. I didn’t have to fly all over hell and gone to figure it out.

So after all of this played out in real fucking time over the past 4 years. This woman has the unmitigated gall to get up on stage and blame Donald Trump! What the FUCK?

How could anyone believe a word out of her mouth?

I would like to say the following to her in these words on national television.

Look honey, Donald Trump hasn’t been President for 4 years. Y’all won the election, remember???

So tell me you lying skank, how is it that Donald Trump is responsible for the absolute disaster that has unfolded on our borders during your administration’s tenure?

If he is responsible, why didn’t you stop it? Surely President Biden could have issued an executive order to prevent Donald Trump from throwing the border open and flooding the country with illegals, right???

She actually said Trump called some buddies in congress and told them to “Tank” the border bill. Uh, the bill she’s talking about passed the House. It’s still a live bill. It didn’t pass first time around the Senate. It’s on their docket to be reviewed again. 

The Senate is 49 to 48 Republicans versus Democrats, so something about her statement doesn’t smell quite right. I think the non-passage out of the Senate might have more to do with the 24 other related bills including a motion that has the term “For Other Purposes” Twice in its title. I’d be looking really hard at what those other purposes included, spent money on, or allowed.

So basically she’s lying again and making it look like Trump has way more power than he does in Congress. Essentially she’s kind of implying that Congress is corrupt and Donald Trump is pulling their strings. If I were a member of Congress I’d be really pissed off that she sullied my reputation for a campaign sound bite.

I’ll be damned if I vote for this lying skank of a Democrat. God Damn! I hate being lied to!

This isn’t about her being misunderstood, or so brilliant, the plebes at the lower rungs of society can’t understand her. This is about a snake of a politician who will do or say literally anything to remain in office.

This is a person who believes that We The People are so dumb she can lie to our face showing the height of disrespect and contempt for us, yet still expect to have our votes.

Remember that, all you “Anyone but Trump” voters. 

And remember this too, when Kamala gets into the oval office, (& I believe she will, by hook or crook, cheating, assassination, riots, or insurrection,) what comes next is on you! 

I say that not because I prefer Trump over Kamala. But because you were all so fixated on hatred of Trump that you would rather see a completely corrupt moron in the office of The President than to choose the better of two poor candidates. At least with Trump we know what we’re in for. With Kamala… Who knows? Because who knows who is actually pulling her strings?

Oh I’m going to vote even though I think the fix is already in. I didn’t vote for President in 2016 because I thought neither candidate was qualified. I did vote in 2020 because I didn’t think Biden was qualified. I’m damn sure voting in 2024 because I know Kamala Harris isn’t qualified at all.

Not that it will matter when she’s ushered into office, as she’s been ushered into every single office she’s ever held.

At least I’ll be able to sleep at night or look myself in the mirror knowing I had nothing to do with whatever shit storm this woman unleashes on us.

Sorry to be such a bummer, but fuck! I saw her blaming Trump again, (not that he’s any angel), and it really pissed me off.

CNN issues retraction after using digitally altered photos of Trump & Loomer

Cnn logo red png 3.It’s interesting that you can find articles all over the media, & X about it.

But looking for “CNN Retraction” will not present you with a link to CNN.COM wherein you could actually read what they said. Nor does “CNN Correction” present you with what CNN actually did or said.

Rather than continue to fuck around with CNN’s obfuscation I’ll simply read the hearsay from other journalists.

The short story: Anderson Cooper and other CNN anchors used fake photos on Friday and Saturday presenting them as real in some sort of negative report on Trump and Laura Loomer.

Absolutely nothing new there! I don’t really give a shit CNN has become a televised “National Enquirer”. Although, that might be an insult to National Enquirer.

My train of thought went in a completely different direction. 

Regardless of CNN’s correction, retraction, misspeaking, or whatever. The damage is done. There are a shit ton of people who will never see or hear that CNN was wrong, again, and they will run off believing whatever smear CNN painted Trump & Loomer with.

Even if Loomer sues, as she’s threatening to do, it won’t matter. CNN will lose some money, Loomer will get some money but her reputation will still be sullied.

Anderson Cooper and the other anchors will still get their 6 digit paychecks, and they’ll blame the CNN staff for the mistake. The Anchors and Production Managers will say, “We can’t check everything prior to going on air in this competitive market…

I might even believe it… Except that it rarely happens, and when I say rarely, I mean 98.9999999999% of the time, when they’re talking about their favored Party, People, or Subjects. They don’t make mistakes, they check everything and are very quick to “Fact Check” anyone who speaks ill of their preferred narratives.

So with demonstrable bias, CNN and other news outlets blithely spew misinformation.

Wait

Haven’t people gone to jail for misinformation? Why yes… Douglass Mackey was sentenced to 7 months in prison for posting memes on Twitter encouraging Clinton supporters to vote via text message.

Hillary Clinton recently suggested that aside from indictments against Russians for direct election interference, that perhaps civil or criminal charges should be levied against Americans for parroting “Russian propaganda”. 

Oh, like the Hunter Biden Laptop? That Russian Propaganda? Where we had the news media and 51 Intelligence officers tell us the laptop was fake, just before the last election. We’ve since learned that had that information been widely presented instead of suppressed people might have voted for Trump instead of Biden.

Under Hillary’s suggestion, should we be charging and / or imprisoning members of the media or those 51 intelligence officers. One could argue they engaged in election interference and that the Russians had profited from the wide spread misinformation in the form of tipping the election toward Biden.

Hillary Clinton really hates Russians doesn’t she? She’s been going on about Russians one way or another, for almost a decade now…

CNN and other new outlets might be forgiven for their spewing of misinformation during COVID with regard to efficacy of vaccines, alternative treatments, etc. Generally speaking, they were acting in good faith based on the available information, much of it from government sources.

But, and this is just my opinion, they didn’t have to go the extra mile to ridicule and discredit scientists and doctors who expressed dissenting opinions.

These news outlets, to this day have never apologized for the damage they did to scientists and doctors who not only dissented, but as time moves on, appear to have been correct. The government apologizing to these same individuals for their part in harming the scientists careers,  would herald the apocalypse.

All of which begs the question. Can CNN and the legacy media be trusted anymore? If not, then where are we to get our information? It’s a foregone conclusion that our government cannot be trusted.

If I were conspiracy minded, I’d say this was part of an overarching plan to destroy all non government news organizations and once they’re throughly discredited they’ll be replaced with some form of State News Agency

American News NetworkANNNews from your government who is Father and Mother, protecting us all from threats internal & external.

That would certainly make control of the, what’s the word, proletariat, easier wouldn’t it?

Oddly, I seem to recall Kamala Harris speaking in favor of some kind of misinformation laws applied nationally.

However entering a search in google or duck duck go. Returns everything about misinformation as it’s been applied to Harris but not her actual stance on the matter.

“is kamala harris in favor of misinformation laws?” Or “has kamala harris proposed misinformation laws?” Presents ZERO information pertaining to the question.

As I’ve mentioned before, our search engine technology is becoming more useless every day. Why can’t the search engines present the most direct answer to the query then present other related materials.

They used to do this with ease. Now, it seems that even our search engines are purposely obfuscating information.

The problem might be that Harris routinely changes her mind and that might be confusing the search engines. Much as her stance on gun control and virtually every other thing she says is subject to change based on the direction the wind is blowing.

The point I was trying to make is, if Harris is in favor of misinformation laws nationally that are similar to those signed into law by Gavin Newsom, then it’s possible something like the ANN as I described above is closer than we think.

AOC, Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders, Dan Goldman, Nancy Pelosi, and many other Democrats in Congress have on occasion expressed approval of, or desire for, abridgments of freedom of speech. With presidential backing misinformation laws and in fact an office of misinformation such as was proposed early in the Biden administration could easily become reality.

The justification used to “Sell” abridgment of The First Amendment to the American People could even be pointing to the permanent harm misinformation does to someone like Laura Loomer, Donald Trump, Doctors, and Scientists. 

That would be the ultimate slap in the face wouldn’t it?

The people harmed by institutionalized, approved misinformation who spoke out in defense of Freedom of Speech and demanded responsibility of the news media, having the harm done to them, used to curtail The First Amendment.