Busted! When AI writing goes off the rails!

I routinely look at articles discussing Apple iPhone’s “Dynamic Island”. It’s a relatively new feature on iPhones and a new feature for me as this is the first iPhone I’ve owned that incorporated it.

Every once in a while I’ll have an app running, then switch to something else. At these times I’m made aware of the Dynamic Island because interesting information from one or more apps is displayed in the island.

Not all apps support Dynamic Island, nor do they need to. However, I’m always intrigued when an app puts something in the island.

This morning I ran across this article about the DI and had a really good laugh after my brain rebooted once or twice. The article starts getting really funny in the “Apple’s Vision for the Dynamic Island” section.

Here for your amusement is a copy of the article in case someone over at cellularnews.com wakes up and realizes the AI made up all the content.

I suppose it’s possible that cellularnews.com or the listed source thesweetsetup.com are a completely bogus site designed for nothing but pushing advertisements. Perhaps this article is satire?


Apple Reveals Its Actual Thoughts On The Dynamic Island

Written by: Blaire Lubin | Last updated on January 24, 2024

Tech Insights & Trends

Industry News

Mobile Accessories

apple-reveals-its-actual-thoughts-on-the-dynamic-island

Source: Thesweetsetup.com

When it comes to cell phones and mobile accessories, Apple has always been at the forefront of innovation and design. Their latest revelation, the Dynamic Island, is no exception. Apple’s new product promises to revolutionize the way we interact with our mobile devices. But what are Apple’s actual thoughts on the Dynamic Island? In this article, we will delve into the minds of Apple and explore their insights and vision behind this groundbreaking creation. From the design concept to the functionality, we will uncover the secrets that make the Dynamic Island a must-have accessory for every cell phone user. So, let’s dive in and discover Apple’s true perspective on the Dynamic Island.

Inside This Article

Apple’s Vision for the Dynamic Island

The Technological Innovations of the Dynamic Island

The Environmental Impact of the Dynamic Island

The Potential Challenges and Benefits of the Dynamic Island

Conclusion

FAQs

Apple’s Vision for the Dynamic Island

Apple is renowned for its groundbreaking innovations in the tech industry. From the iPhone to the Apple Watch, the company has consistently pushed the boundaries of what is possible in the world of technology. Now, Apple is turning its attention to a new frontier: the creation of a Dynamic Island.

So, what exactly is a Dynamic Island? According to Apple, it is a revolutionary concept that combines cutting-edge technology with sustainable design principles. The goal is to create an island that is not only a place to live and work but also a living ecosystem that adapts and evolves with the needs of its inhabitants.

At the core of Apple’s vision for the Dynamic Island is the integration of smart technologies. Imagine a place where buildings are seamlessly connected, and everything from lighting to transportation is controlled by an intelligent network. This would not only enhance the convenience and efficiency of daily life but also minimize waste and energy consumption.

But it doesn’t stop there. Apple’s vision also includes the utilization of renewable energy sources. Solar panels and wind turbines would be strategically incorporated into the island’s infrastructure, ensuring a sustainable and eco-friendly power supply. Additionally, advanced waste management systems would be implemented to minimize pollution and promote recycling.

One of the key aspects of the Dynamic Island is its adaptability. Apple envisions an island that can respond to the changing needs and desires of its residents. This means that buildings can be easily reconfigured or even moved to different locations, allowing for the flexible use of space. Whether it’s creating new residential areas, expanding commercial zones, or transforming public spaces, the Dynamic Island can accommodate it all.

Furthermore, Apple recognizes the importance of fostering a sense of community and connection within the Dynamic Island. The company plans to create vibrant public spaces where people can come together, collaborate, and socialize. Green parks, recreational facilities, and cultural venues will be carefully integrated into the island’s design, promoting a healthy and balanced lifestyle.

Apple’s vision for the Dynamic Island is an ambitious one, but it aligns perfectly with the company’s commitment to innovation and sustainability. By creating a smart, adaptable, and eco-friendly living environment, Apple is setting the stage for a new era of urban development.

As the company continues to explore and refine its vision, we can expect to see even more exciting developments in the near future. The Dynamic Island represents a bold step forward in the evolution of smart cities and serves as a shining example of what is possible when technology and sustainability come together.

The Technological Innovations of the Dynamic Island

The Dynamic Island is not just a groundbreaking architectural marvel – it is also a testament to the limitless possibilities of technological innovation. From its inception, Apple envisioned the Dynamic Island as a hub of technological advancements that would redefine the way we interact with our environment and each other.

One of the most notable technological features of the Dynamic Island is its smart infrastructure. Powered by advanced IoT (Internet of Things) technology, the entire island is interconnected. Every building, streetlight, and vehicle is equipped with sensors and actuators, creating a network that constantly collects and analyzes data to optimize efficiency and enhance the island’s functionality.

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in the operations of the Dynamic Island. The AI-powered virtual assistants, embedded in every corner of the island, act as personal concierges, providing real-time information and personalized services to residents and visitors. Whether it’s finding the best route to a destination or recommending local attractions, the virtual assistants are there to make every experience on the island seamless and convenient.

The Dynamic Island is also a pioneer in renewable energy solutions. It harnesses solar panels and wind turbines strategically placed throughout the island to generate clean and sustainable energy. The advanced energy management system intelligently monitors and optimizes the distribution of this renewable energy, minimizing wastage and reducing the island’s carbon footprint.

Another technological breakthrough on the Dynamic Island is its integration of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) experiences. Visitors can immerse themselves in interactive virtual worlds or enhance their real-world encounters with digital overlays, giving rise to a new dimension of entertainment, education, and communication.

The transportation system on the Dynamic Island is perhaps one of its most awe-inspiring innovations. A network of autonomous vehicles, powered by electric engines, seamlessly navigates the island, offering efficient and eco-friendly transportation options. These cutting-edge vehicles communicate with the island’s smart infrastructure, ensuring a smooth and synchronized flow of traffic throughout the island.

The technological innovations on the Dynamic Island are not limited to buildings and infrastructure. The island provides its residents with seamless connectivity through advanced 5G networks, enabling high-speed internet access and facilitating the integration of smart devices into everyday life.

Overall, the Dynamic Island serves as a testament to Apple’s commitment to technological innovation and sustainable living. Its smart infrastructure, AI integration, renewable energy solutions, AR/VR experiences, autonomous transportation, and connectivity advancements make it a remarkable model for future cities and a true testament to the power of technology.

The Environmental Impact of the Dynamic Island

The Dynamic Island, with its advanced technological features and cutting-edge design, offers a plethora of benefits to users. However, it is essential to consider the environmental impact that this innovative creation may have. While the island is designed to be sustainable and eco-friendly, there are still important factors to consider.

1. Energy Consumption: The Dynamic Island utilizes various technologies that require a substantial amount of energy to function optimally. From its advanced lighting systems to its interactive screens, energy consumption is a significant consideration. Efforts must be made to ensure that the island’s energy needs are met using renewable sources, such as solar or wind power, to minimize its carbon footprint.

2. E-Waste Management: With the rapid advancement of technology, electronic waste (e-waste) has become a significant concern worldwide. The Dynamic Island, with its intricate components and sophisticated features, may also contribute to the e-waste stream. It is crucial for the creators of the island to implement effective recycling programs and promote responsible disposal of old or damaged components.

3. Environmental Preservation: The construction and maintenance of the Dynamic Island must take into account the impact on the surrounding environment. Special consideration should be given to the preservation of natural habitats, reduction of noise pollution, and protection of flora and fauna in the area. Additionally, sustainable materials and practices should be implemented during the construction process to minimize the ecological footprint.

4. Water Usage: The Dynamic Island incorporates various water features to enhance its appeal and functionality. However, the efficient use of water resources is paramount. Technologies such as water recycling systems and automated irrigation should be employed to ensure water conservation and minimize wastage.

5. Long-Term Sustainability: The environmental impact of the Dynamic Island should not only be considered during its construction phase but also its long-term sustainability. Regular monitoring and evaluation should be conducted to identify areas for improvement and ensure continuous adherence to eco-friendly practices.

The Potential Challenges and Benefits of the Dynamic Island

As exciting as the concept of the Dynamic Island may be, it is essential to consider both the potential challenges and benefits that accompany such a technological innovation. Let’s explore some of the key factors that could impact the success and implementation of this revolutionary idea.

Challenges

1. Infrastructure: Building a Dynamic Island from scratch would require a significant investment in infrastructure. The construction of this virtual paradise would involve the deployment of a vast network of sensors, communication systems, and power sources, presenting logistical challenges and costs.

2. Privacy and Security Concerns: With the integration of numerous sensors and IoT devices, privacy and security become critical concerns. Ensuring that personal data remains confidential and protected from cyber threats would require robust measures and protocols to safeguard user information.

3. Ethical Considerations: The Dynamic Island raises ethical questions surrounding the impact on wildlife and the environment. Constructing a virtual paradise could disrupt ecosystems and wildlife habitats, necessitating careful planning and mitigation strategies to minimize any negative effects on the natural world.

4. Social Inclusion: The implementation of the Dynamic Island shouldn’t exacerbate existing social inequalities. It is crucial to ensure equal access to the island’s benefits and opportunities, avoiding the creation of a digital divide between different socio-economic groups.

Benefits

1. Innovative Integration: The Dynamic Island offers the potential for seamless integration of various smart technologies. From smart homes to autonomous transportation systems, this interconnected environment could revolutionize the way we live, work, and interact with our surroundings.

2. Enhanced Sustainability: With a focus on green technologies and renewable energy sources, the Dynamic Island could serve as a model for sustainability. By implementing eco-friendly solutions and practices, such as efficient waste management and renewable energy generation, the island could significantly reduce its ecological footprint.

3. Improved Quality of Life: The Dynamic Island would aim to enhance the overall quality of life for its residents. Smart healthcare systems, advanced AI-assisted services, and seamless connectivity would contribute to convenience, efficiency, and overall well-being.

4. Economic Opportunities: The implementation of the Dynamic Island would generate a wide array of economic opportunities. The construction, maintenance, and management of the infrastructure would lead to job creation, technological innovation, and sector growth, stimulating the local economy.

Conclusion

As we conclude our exploration of Apple’s thoughts on the Dynamic Island, it becomes evident that the tech giant recognizes the potential of this innovative concept. With its emphasis on modular and customizable mobile accessories, the Dynamic Island opens up a whole new world of possibilities for smartphone users. Apple’s enthusiasm for this idea is reflected in their commitment to research and development, as well as their collaboration with accessory manufacturers.

By embracing the Dynamic Island, Apple is not only catering to the evolving needs and preferences of their customers but also setting a new standard for mobile accessories in the industry. The integration of advanced technologies, sustainability-driven design, and seamless user experience is set to redefine how we interact with our smartphones.

As we eagerly await the release of Apple’s Dynamic Island, it’s clear that this groundbreaking concept will revolutionize the way we use and accessorize our mobile devices. The possibilities are endless, and the future of mobile accessories looks brighter than ever.

FAQs

1. What are mobile accessories?

Mobile accessories refer to supplementary devices or products that are used to enhance the functionality, aesthetics, or protection of mobile phones. These accessories can include items such as cases, screen protectors, chargers, headphones, power banks, and more.

2. Why should I invest in mobile accessories?

Investing in mobile accessories can greatly enhance your overall mobile experience. Accessories like cases and screen protectors offer protection against physical damage and scratches, while chargers and power banks ensure you never run out of battery power. Headphones and Bluetooth speakers improve audio quality, and mobile stands or mounts provide convenience for hands-free usage.

3. Are all mobile accessories compatible with all phone models?

No, not all mobile accessories are compatible with every phone model. Manufacturers create accessories specifically designed for certain phone models, taking into consideration factors like measurements, ports, and features. Therefore, it is essential to choose accessories that are compatible with your specific phone model to ensure a proper fit and functionality.

4. How do I choose the right mobile accessories?

Choosing the right mobile accessories depends on your individual needs and preferences. Consider factors such as the type of protection you require, the desired functionalities, and the overall aesthetics that align with your personal style. Additionally, make sure to check compatibility with your phone model and read reviews or seek recommendations to ensure the quality and reliability of the accessories.

5. Are there any tips for maintaining and cleaning mobile accessories?

Yes, there are a few tips for maintaining and cleaning mobile accessories. For cases and screen protectors, wiping them with a soft cloth and mild cleaning solution can help remove dirt and smudges. To clean headphones or earbuds, gently wipe the exterior with a damp cloth and use a small brush to remove any debris from the speaker grilles. Always refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for specific cleaning recommendations and avoid using harsh chemicals or abrasive materials that could damage the accessories.

Harvard isn’t what it once was

And now I have a partial explanation for how COVID-19 became what it was and how vaccines that don’t work came to be foisted on the world as “Safe and Effective” when apparently they are neither.

An ars Technica article is reporting 37 questionable studies at a Harvard affiliated cancer research center.

For goodness sake. 

What the hell happened to data integrity? 

Anyone incorporating these research papers into their own research might be led down a research dead end not because their original theory was incorrect but because they used “facts/proofs” from these papers. 

That wastes time, money (in research grants) and potentially, lives of desperate people participating in clinical trials.

I suppose this is how we end up with snake oil being sold by “real” Doctors. I suppose it’s also how “real” Doctors can stand by, knowing that the “approved” treatment protocol for a disease, (For example COVID,) was doing more harm than good.

It’s how we get scientific “Consensus” that is almost entirely incorrect about a wide variety of things. Obviously, it’s not just medicine. The spooky thing is, if this is happening in medical research, where the highest level of diligence next to nuclear bomb research is supposed to be in place, then it’s probably everywhere.

Is current geologic research just slap dash and missing the signs of a 9.0 earthquake in Northern California where Mt St Helens, and the Yellowstone super volcano all blow at the same time? Are those signs being missed because the actual observation data doesn’t fit a shitty research paper, or papers and is being thrown out?

Have we missed new energy sources, or warp drive, because of some copy / pasted incorrect data dampening a brilliant mind that perceived an anomaly but decided not to research that anomaly because the literature said it’s an instrumentation or computational error?

SCIENCE is about truth! Above all else. 

Science is observing and recording what is. Science is using those observations to predict behavior of the natural world and once that behavior is understood, science can tweak the input variables to change the outcome.

Science is also about understanding and accepting that when we’re on the boundary of the “known” sometimes science can go no further. That road block is not failure, it’s a sign that either we missed something fundamental, or our tools aren’t sophisticated enough to proceed. While the initial data is checked, the sophistication of the tools increases and the road block turns out to be only temporary.

If so called scientists and researchers are willfully fucking over the integrity of data and disseminating false results, then the basic underpinnings of science and scientific process are contaminated and at risk. 

It is possible that Academia has sunk this low, and failed humanity in selfish pursuit of money over knowledge?

A reasonable question to ask at this point is:

Is the lack of integrity and principals confined to Harvard?

I strongly suspect that it’s not due to the competitive nature of grants and donors.

Can anything MIT, Yale, the entire UC system, Stanford, or in fact any “Top” research center or college publishes, actually be trusted?

Sadly, I think not. I say this with a heavy heart and ask you to consider the following.

Can we trust the climate change folks, or the climate deniers? We know that a large percentage of the “Climate Change Data” was falsified. The simulation used to claim the planet had 12 years left was rife with errors and inconsistencies where the data was manipulated to produce a dire outcome.

The reason for this appears to have been more research money, fame, & fortune! But it spawned the “Consensus” bullshit on the one side and the “Climate Change deniers” on the other. 

The impact is that instead of having real data that was as good as it could be, presenting that data to the people of the world and using it to become better stewards of our beautiful planet. Really good and accurate research was thrown out with the contaminated data by 1/2 the planet.

There are a few people like myself who think we each should do our best to limit our long term effect on the planet. At the same time, we must intelligently assess and balance human needs versus planetary ecology. We should also be able to place our faith in our advancing technological capabilities, because if we’re all thinking about using our resources wisely then our “mistakes of necessity” today can and will probably be mitigated by technology of tomorrow.

That only works IF SCIENCE is indeed TRUTH.

There’s danger in bad or politicized research too. Look at COVID. We were actively shutting down scientists, real scientists who had actual data describing the dangers of mRNA. They weren’t blue skying or theorizing. These scientists had actually used and in some cases abandoned mRNA because of its inherent instability.

Instability mind you, that made mRNA unsuitable for their research on rats.

The world censored them, and ignored their real world experience in the matter. That’s like ignoring the man with the charred hand telling you that fire is hot.

Our society did exactly that. This is not to say that at some point in the future mRNA therapies won’t be safe, stable, and effective. However, right now we just don’t know enough to call mRNA therapy Safe. The scientists warning against the use of mRNA weren’t saying it should never be used, they were saying that it wasn’t ready to be used, YET.

What about CERN? Those folks are playing with stuff that could really go awry, can we trust that they’re not faking data, or worse yet unknowingly using falsified data in their experiments? If they are using bad data, where might that lead given the nature of their investigations and experiments? I’m not in the “CERN will create a black hole that destroys the world camp.” But there’s a whole lot of energy CERN uses, and directs, I’d hate to think their math is wrong. 

I think that no scientist should be censored, and the politics has no place in scientific endeavor. I also think it’s time for cut / paste researchers or Phds to pay a price for their deceit. I believe they should be tossed out of their field and never allowed to work or teach their subject of study again. 

I know that’s super harsh, but the consequence should be so terrible that no-one would risk it. Mistakes are one thing, actual deceit for a grant is criminal.

It’s the only way I can see to restore the integrity of science.

This month in Modern Prostitution Magazine…

Don’t miss our top article

E. Jean Carroll

How to get paid without having to be laid.

We have an in depth interview with our hero, and brand new millionaire E Jean Carroll.

For those of you that need this spelled out…

THE ABOVE IS SATIRE


I saw that woman on TV talking with Rachel Maddow. It’s rare that I’ve been so offended but DAMN! I’ve never been closer to vomiting over someone speaking on TV in my life.

This woman is a full on NUT JOB! It’s uncomfortable to look at her, much more so, to have to look and listen to her.

Were I updating an encyclopedia, in the article describing misogynists I’d put her picture right next to the reasons some men hate women.

Any man who might have been on the edge of becoming a misogynist certainly became one listening to her gloating and clucking about how she was going to spend money that honestly, she doesn’t deserve. There’s no woman whose hole is that golden. And her’s sure as hell isn’t worth that kind of money.

Especially when you consider that the millions were not awarded to E Jean Carrol because Trump raped her. He DIDN’T according to a jury This obscene award is because Trump said he didn’t know her, never met her, and whatever she was accusing him of was a lie.

Apparently, that hurt her feelings, and the State of New York ALTERED the statute of limitations on slander and liable, (as I understand it,) to allow this bullshit case to be brought against Trump.

I don’t have to like Trump, or agree with him, or indeed consider voting for him, to see this is the most gross miscarriage of justice I’ve seen in my lifetime.

I really hope that Donald Trump dumps all his properties in the state of New York and especially in the City of New York.

I’d like to see Trump not do any business in New York ever again. I think it would be especially interesting if he becomes President again and refuses to do anything in New York City. I could see him flying Marine 1 to the 9/11 monument once a year, attending the services, and then immediately flying out again. No press conferences or anything else. New York City and State has proven that they are not about any form of justice and therefore not actual Americans. At this point let NYC rot!

If this injustice doesn’t make your blood boil you’re missing the point. Changing the laws to allow lawfare and weaponization of the courts against a specific individual? This is not equal justice under the law.


Perhaps I’m just sensitive about legal matters. See I had no standing to sue the shit out of a hospital and cardiologist when Jerry died. His family wasn’t interested in dealing with fucking lawyers. I honestly can’t blame them.

I had enough information that I could pretty much prove malpractice. Mathematically, Scientifically, and Anecdotally. But no-one would listen, and in California the statute of limitations on Malpractice is 1 year.

In other words you have to be ready to file the instant your loved one dies. In the midst of the financial, and emotional chaos, you have to hunt down a scum bag attorney and literally force them to listen and then present them with enough CASH to hold their interest.

This by the way is not justice. Justice, would be a little longer time to file the case. Justice would be, not having to chain an attorney to a desk with a pile of money. Justice is an attorney seeking relief or reparations on behalf of their client because the client was in fact “injured” or as in this case, for the safety of 1000’s of people who live in mountain communities in this local area, all of whom are at risk because the medical facility doesn’t understand how oxygen and atmospheric pressure works.

The time period has expired.

That hospital and cardiologist will effectively kill an untold number of people, and will learn nothing. Medical arrogance knows no bounds, and doesn’t engage in introspection.

In Jan of 2023, this particular hospital was FAR MORE interested in making sure everyone was wearing a mask. I must point out that by Jan 2023 mask efficacy against COVID-19 had been throughly debunked internationally, and by our own CDC, FDA, and numerous medical papers from research hospitals and colleges across the planet.

Perhaps the medical people at that hospital should get back to “real” science instead of following the pseudo scientific recommendations of CNN.

It’s over, the opportunity is gone and it’s time to move on.


See, that’s how an adult handles the statute of limitations.

E Jean Carroll keeps getting “Do Overs” because the corrupt justice system of New York, and apparently the Supreme Court of the United States (who should have stepped in to prevent these miscarriages of justice,) have allowed a “cafeteria approach” to the law.

That cafeteria approach has but one singular purpose, to destroy Donald J. Trump.

I guarantee that if I was to keep fighting for justice and what I believe to be public safety, I couldn’t use that cafeteria approach. I’d be shut down in every court in the land.

Lady Justice was blindfolded for a reason, now the fine Lady is being told to weigh the name of the person, the color of the person, the gender identity and ethnicity of the person, and innumerable other factors that at one time were mostly considered irrelevant to matters before the court.

I have no desire to participate in the legal system after what I’ve seen in the past four to six years. Why should I sit in a jury box? The case is decided before the jury is empaneled.

The truth table is simple:

Black/brown man kills/assaults/robs/ white man = black/brown man innocent.

White man kills/assaults/robs/ black/brown man = white man guilty.

If a woman is in any of the positions then white man guilty.

Since these are the rules, why bother with trials, attorneys,judges, or any of the bullshit? And why should I be compelled to listen to the antics for $5 a day? By the way, $5 won’t buy me a gallon of gas.


This whole E Jean Carrol thing is blatant in your face messaging, and it’s not about Donald J Trump.

The message is:

“Hey You dumb fuck sheep, we can fuck you anytime we want to. So you better keep your mouth shut, vote for who we tell you, and do as you’re told. OR ELSE! We are the power elite, we’ll always be able to find someone to accuse you, and those cherished rights you believe you have? We’ll annul those faster than you can say Miranda Rights.”

Well that’s interesting.

Finally after a very long wait VMWare released a version of Fusion that downloads appropriate files, then creates a functional ISO image of the ARM version of Windows 11. 

That’s a lot of techno babble.

What it means is that there are two version of Windows. One runs on the familiar Intel processors and the other runs on ARM design processors.

VMWare is a well known application or more properly a suite of applications that allow you to virtualize a computer. The practical upshot of this is you can have multiple instances of a computer operating system running on a single hardware platform.

So if you needed to, for example, test a new bit of software on Windows 7, 8, 10, and Red Hat Linux, and perhaps some flavor of UNIX. You wouldn’t need to have 6 dedicated computers, nor would you have to manage loading each operating system sequentially on a single machine for each testing run. Instead you could use virtual instances of each OS simultaneously, limited only by memory and the speed / capabilities of the Processor of the host system.

Often this kind of thing is run on powerful servers during automated testing and for manual testing you have a client that allows you to create or use an instance of the operating system(s) under test on your local machine without having to flush your local machine’s native operating system. You can even have 2 or 3 operating systems running at once for comparison sake and logging purposes.

VMWare Fusion is an application I’ve used for years to enable my Mac to run Windows, Linux, and even other versions of the Mac OS. It’s slick and efficient. 

When I made the leap to Apple Silicon, things got a little more interesting. When Apple was running Intel processors VMWare just loaded the intel version of Windows or whatever and off you went. 

Apple Silicon changed all that. While I really like Apple Silicon for it’s speed, power efficiency, and God knows it’s nice to not have fans screaming all the time when the processor is under a load, Apple Silicon looks like an ARM (RISC) processor. Which makes compatibility with some software a bit more problematic.

It’s funny because Apple has come full circle. The old PowerPC processors Apple used to use, were RISC processors too. They were, in many ways faster than comparable Intel chips for some functions. They too sometimes  had compatibility issues with some applications that were ported from other hardware.

6 – 8 months ago, I downloaded and compiled an ARM version of Windows 11, then created the ISO and loaded it into VMWare Fusion. I didn’t like the resultant Windows OS and it was very “twitchy”. So after fiddling around a bit I deleted the image and went on with my life.

I noticed on Sunday that my VMWare installation had updated. I got curious, and fired it up. It threw some errors because it was looking for the Windows install. I resolved those errors and was presented with a nice clean dialog box offering to download and install Windows 11. 

Okay, no skin off my nose. So I told the system to do it.

I should state upfront I really hate Windows.

VMWare Fusion did exactly what it said it was gonna do. It downloaded a copy of Windows 11, it compiled it and saved it as an ISO image that I could burn to CD or store in another fashion.

Then It fired up a standard Windows setup and directed me to the ISO image stored on my computer. Boom! In about 30 minutes start to finish I had a functional, stable, Windows 11 installation.

I’m not thrilled with Windows 11 itself, but having a copy to screw around with is useful for me. I can catch up knowledge wise to the latest version, and if by some miracle I get an actual new job. I won’t have to purchase another computer.

Unfortunately, I can’t run anything less than Windows 11 on this computer / VMWare combination. So if I have to do a bunch of testing on previous versions of Windows, I’ll have to get an intel system.

Sunday brought some neat advances. As I said I still don’t like Windows 11 and I’m even more annoyed at Microsoft.

I put into their search dialog, “How do I purchase Windows licenses?”

I still haven’t found a way to just purchase the license. I did find that Microsoft is apparently selling PCs on their website. So what are you Microsoft? Are you a sofware vendor or are you a PC retailer? 

All I need is the 16 digit license bullshit. I don’t need a PC, I don’t need a USB Stick with an Intel only version of Windows on it, I just want to send you money and in return you send me the code.

My God! Why do these people insist on complicating the simplest things? Thank goodness, I don’t need to find out how to jerk off from the Microsoft Web Site. My balls would have exploded and I’d still be looking for the appropriate information.

Apple, don’t get all smug… Your website is becoming shitty too. 

Here we Go Again!

China has created a COVID variant that is more deadly than the previous version. 20X more deadly supposedly. I suppose that means it’s only likely to kill humans 4% of the time or some such. What none of the fear mongering articles answer is does previous COVID-19 exposure and recovery, confer immunity to this particular variant.

China is apparently dealing with some respiratory disease that they claim is not covid but is widespread enough that some of their cities are still operating under covid protocols.

But that doesn’t matter!

Chinese folks are traveling the world for the Lunar New Year. 

Ya know folks… We’ve seen this movie before.

Let’s see:

Disease that causes China to enact quarantine protocol for some cities. CHECK

Election Year in the United States where one candidate is a threat to Chinese hegemony, and the other is a useful empty shell that can be commanded to dance. CHECK

Billions of Chinese travelers flying all over the world like dandelion seeds perhaps carrying the new contagion. CHECK

Bioweapons are expressly prohibited by treaty. The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibited the use of biological weapons. A supplementary convention was adopted in 1972 that apparently expanded the rules to prevent weasel-wording your way out of having created a bio-weapon.

In other words folks, we’ve known for almost 100 years that biological weapons were a SUPER BAD Idea. Yet, the Chinese military and other militaries around the world are still fucking around with them. 

Biological weapons disseminate disease-causing organisms or toxins to harm or kill humans, animals or plants. They can be deadly and highly contagious. Diseases caused by such weapons would not confine themselves to national borders and could spread rapidly around the world. The consequences of the deliberate release of biological agents or toxins by state or non-state actors could be dramatic. In addition to the tragic loss of lives, such events could cause food shortages, environmental catastrophes, devastating economic loss, and widespread illness, fear and mistrust among the public.

That’s from the UN office for Disarmament Affairs 

I’ve highlighted in blue an interesting passage right from the top of the page.

Not that the UN has any power other than the power to insult or demean Western countries specifically the United States over past transgressions, while member countries castigating the West, are currently engaging in those same activities. Slavery, paging Slavery, Women’s rights, paging Women’s rights. Border enforcement, paging border enforcement…

I personally think the United States should end its affiliation with the United Nations. I think the UN building in New York should be reconfigured as migrant housing, and the United Nations should be asked to relocate to Geneva, or The Netherlands, or a sinking cruise ship in the middle of the Atlantic. I really don’t care, as long as these fuckers are off American Soil.

As I’ve said before, I think that if the UN wants to involve the United State Military to solve a dispute, they should pay for our services UP FRONT. Or… they can offer us useful natural resources and commit their non-combatants to farming, mining, or refining those resources. They treat our Military like mercenaries, WE SHOULD BE PAID like mercenaries.

I digress.

The United Nations, like the World Health Organization, is pretty much owned by China. Neither of these organizations are any more interested in the well being of The West, specifically the United States, than Ghingis Khan would be (or the World Economic Forum is). The sooner we understand and accept this simple fact the better off we’ll all be.

For those of you who may have failed English, here’s the simple version:

UN, WHO, WEF, China… ALL ENEMIES. They be bad for us n shit.

The highlighted text should sound very familiar. We’ve lived it over the past three to four years.

Now coincidentally, we have the WEF and the WHO and UN all talking about the “Hypothetical” Disease X [dum dum duuuummm]. Interesting that they’re talking about it and supposedly making plans to “combat” it, while China is apparently building it, and quite possibly, using their people to spread it, world wide.

It would be simple… All the Chinese folks going through security checkpoints or disease checkpoints at airports get spritzed with whatever contagion, They’re not sick when they leave, they’re not sick when they arrive at their destination.

They get sick while they’re on holiday in whatever country they’ve decided to visit contaminating the locals and voila, the desired country is decimated, or if China is really lucky “Cleansed” entirely of the vermin who disagreed with their politics.

We’ve all gotten used to security checkpoints at airports, we’d think nothing of stepping into or through a “Scanner” would we?

The CCP could even use their citizen’s destination as a method to target specific countries. It’s evil beyond belief, but as they say you’ve gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet. The same is true of global conquest. So you kill a few hundred thousand of your own people. Big deal!

If their deaths killed millions of your enemy it’s a good trade off. Those of your own who died are “Heroes of the cause”, right? The State can build monuments to their sacrifice and make annual speeches about their dedication to the cause for decades, if not centuries.

Isn’t that how mass murderers and genocidal maniacs justify their actions?

I truly hope that I’m wrong, and that China won’t use a bioweapon to interfere in our election process. (Again?) but the pattern seems just a little too close. March 11th 2020 was when the WHO declared COVID-19 a WorldwidePandemic. March 11th 1918 was the Influenza pandemic a bit over 100 years prior. I’m not going to be surprised to hear the WHO declare March 11th, 2024 a Disease X pandemic. 

When some people with rudimentary education in science (real science) say, “Wait, pandemics usually only happen every 100 years or so.”

The response will be, “MORON CLIMATE CHANGE has accelerated the cycle. Now you dumb science deniers shut up and get to the back of the fucking bus! We must pray to Sol. Perhaps the sun god will charge our bus enough to deliver you to the work camp.”

Those who question the narrative will be immediately and possibly permanently silenced, (aside from a recording of Bumbling Joe Biden explaining, “You’re being shot because corn pop uhhh well I’m a working guy from scranton, and uhh, uhhh, uhhh, white supremacy!” ) Then momentary M-16 fire.

The Media will say it’s, “For the Greater Good, and our Safety and Security.

Thus ends The Republic. With not even a whimper heard in the darkness.

As I said, I really hope I’m wrong. But the similarities in the set up are spooking even a nasty asshole like me!