I’m torn with the rain.

On the one hand I really like hearing rain on the roof. It’s a perfect day to snooze and not worry about anything. On the other hand, it’s a perfect day to stay in my sweats & watch 1950s sci-fi movies.

I had one of those nights lat night where I was tired, went to bed, and bang my brain said, “Nope! I’m going to start thinking right now.”

Needless to say, it wasn’t very restful.

Maybe I’ll get a bowl of cereal and watch Looney Toons DVDs. That would have been a typical thing for me to do on a rainy Saturday in my childhood.

I’ve scanned the national news. I’m sure that the local news is doing one of their “StormWatch” special coverage events providing moment by moment details of local flooding and holding their breath that some disaster will occur so they’ll have something to lament.

My phone just went off with an emergency alert about flash floods.

I’m hoping for a break in the rain to go for a walk. Right now there’ve been squall lines passing through about every 10 minutes. The storm will let up a bit giving me hope, then kick up a notch.

At this rate I’m not going to close my rings today. I don’t mind walking in light misty rain, but neither Jesse or I like walking in downpours with the wind whipping around us. I won’t mention the clean up of our muddy foot prints, or the smell of wet dog.

I’m leaning more toward Looney Toons & snoozing.

 

Apple enabled their digital Passport ID in Apple Wallet yesterday.

Uhh.

Yeah, no…

I’m not interested. In the year that I’ve had the California digital ID I’ve not had one single situation that it was useful. 

Nada, Zero, None.

Aside from the slow rollout of digital ID on a state level, it appears there’s an even slower adoption rate among vendors. I wan’t expecting it to be used in every liquor store or anything.

But it would be really useful in medical situations, where the paradigm is you hand your ID to some medical clerk who then makes a photo copy of your physical ID then stick that in a file someplace. Although now medical providers want you ro scan your ID and upload it to them yearly.

Or in situations like a cellular provider who wants you to scan and upload your ID to their website.

You’d think that at least in those situations, the security aspects would be obvious and quickly adopted. 

There is the capacity for their website to get the information directly from your phone in a secure tokenized format that only provides the necessary information for their purposes and nothing else.

In the glitch I had with my watch, I lost the California ID that could be presented via the watch. California apparently has no provision to correct that. Instead they keep directing me to a verification web site page that’s not complete. The page says something like “We’re working to get this page operational please check back later.”

I just deleted the mobile license from my watch, because the notification to go to a dead California web page appearing 2 or 3 times a day annoyed me.

The ID is still available on my phone for what it’s worth but since it’s a pointless bit of data, I’m seriously considering deleting it.

Why bother?

Now you can put your passport information in your phone too. But that information is only useful at few TSA checkpoints at scattered airports across the nation. It can’t be used at border checkpoints to enter the country.

So really what good is it?

It’s an interesting little novelty widget, nothing more.

Digital ID has so much potential. It’s a pity it’s not received enough adoption to make it worthwhile.

I fully acknowledge the darker side of digital ID. One only need look at China to understand the dystopian down side.

I appreciate the idealism of digital ID. I’d be very excited if it was widely used in voting, medicine, medical insurance, and as we have recently come to understand EBT/Snap welfare benefits. I think that it could make a hell of a dent in fraud. With the biometric aspect it’s a no brainer in these situations.

However, it’s pretty obvious that the political party that consistently votes against any form of ID being required to access these services would fight tooth and nail against it. They’d make the case that not all the “Poor” have access to phones with the capability. Just as they now say not all the “Poor” have the intellectual ability to get an ID. 

Even though, those people, that party, claims are intellectually deficient, typically have the latest and greatest phone technology which they use constantly to post their TicTok and instagram videos of criminal behavior including threats, or looting & rioting.

It should be noted that in order to get those phones and phone service, they have to provide ID. That’s interesting too because it was that Political Party that voted for IDs to be required if someone chose to purchase a phone with a prepaid plan. Also known as a “Burner” phone.

I’ve come to suspect that the Digital ID thing will slowly fade away at least in this country.

I think this for a number of reasons:

1) There are a lot of people that do not trust our government.
2) I think the digital ID thing is seen as an impediment to getting a new phone. Do you have to re-register the ID’s with the issuing authority every time you change devices? [You don’t as a rule, but the issuing authorities would love that for tracking purposes]
3) Without wide acceptance and use on the part of vendors it’s a nothing burger.
4) Since even Law Enforcement isn’t using the system, requiring the user to carry the physical ID what’s the point?
5) Unless you travel weekly for business you’ll never encounter any situation that the digital ID is used at all. Since even the TSA can’t guarantee that their kiosks are operational at an airport on any given day, a physical ID is still necessary.
6) China’s example of social credit scores, where they use digital ID to absolutely destroy individuals because they said or did something the Chinese government didn’t like.
7) The UK is implementing digital ID and following China’s lead. The people in the UK, while generally compliant to their government’s commands have begun to fight because they see that misuse of the ID abridges their freedoms. The UK is even trying to implement digital IDs for visitors. Though they seem to have a rather large blind spot when it comes to “Asylum Seekers”.
8) There’s the religious overtone about everyone having “The Mark” and being unable to buy or sell unless one has “The Mark”. (As China has demonstrated.)
9) There’s the conspiracy theorist angle that encompasses all of the above and suggests compliance is enslavement. One could argue that we’re already enslaved, but digital IDs simply make the fact of enslavement “In your face”.

For someone like myself who genuinely believed that all the technology I helped to create would benefit humanity this is a depressing turn of events.

The potential for good, is so appealing. Back in my youth, I naively thought that people would choose good over the dark side. “History be damned,” I thought. “Surely we’d learned from our mistakes and wouldn’t choose that dark path again.

As I said, I was idealistic and naive. 

I’m even doubting that I’ll renew my passport when it’s due. There’s no place I want to go to visit anymore. That could change, and I have time.

If however, I chose to expatriate I’d not need a passport. All I need do is illegally enter another county claiming political, or economic asylum, with no ID. That seems to be all the rage these days. One need only look at the piles of ID’s floating in the Mediterranean, or stacked next to the Rio Grande.

For someone like myself, who’s actively trying to reduce my digital footprint and minimize my financial entanglements, digital ID has become a non-starter. I want to fade away, drop off the grid and live free.

The way we’re hooked into the system, has in the past week been underscored by my health insurance provider. I used an app (of course) to try to renew a 90 day prescription. Several hours later the app informed me that the prescription was delayed. Several hours after that, I got a call from the insurance provider.

Stupidly, I answered the call, thinking there was some issue on their part about the prescription. I’d just pulled a rare, hot lunch out of the toaster oven and thought the call would resolve the prescription problem and I’d go on with the rest of my day.

Instead what I got was some girl from some organization that was loosely associated with my insurance provider being quite insistent that I needed to set an appointment with someone else to answer questions for the insurance provider.

I explained that I was just sitting down to lunch and wasn’t interested. I asked if my answering questions was mandatory. She was unable to clearly tell me that, nor was she able to tell me what kinds of questions I needed to answer. Nope! She was badgering and demanding about my setting some appointment with a nurse practitioner, wherein there would be a video conference.

FUCK!

I just wanted to eat my now rapidly cooling meal in peace. On and on, circle within circle this girl annoyed me until I finally said, “FINE! Just set the damn appointment! I don’t give a shit when, just do it.”

40 minutes later I finally hung up the fucking phone. I gave the now cold, meal to the dog because I was so pissed off at that point I didn’t feel like eating.

(Note to self… Next time don’t answer or when the annoyance level reaches “pissed off” just hang up.)

Within minutes, my phone was blowing up with multiple text messages asking how I felt about that phone call, confirming the appointment, and telling me that there was going to be other confirming phone calls, about the appointment, and that I must go to their web site to verify that my technology would accommodate their video conferencing standard.

I don’t take orders or demands very well. I never have. The more insistent or demanding someone is, the less likely I’m going to comply. This is particularly true if I see no direct benefit to me.

In this instance I don’t see any direct benefit and have come to believe this whole thing is nothing more that these folks finding a way to bill for services that I not only did not ask for, and that I don’t want.

The other possibility is that the insurance provider is attempting to get information about my health records that they didn’t get from the useless doctor I saw a month or so ago. I’m wondering if they’re wanting to plug my data into some actuarial table for probability analysis to figure out my risk to them, so they can up the billing or demand that I submit to the merry go round of tests, more tests, and yet more tests, then follow up appointments, all of which are designed to drag me into the medical industrial complex so that I spend my retirement years running like a hamster on a wheel for their benefit, not mine.

Last night I got a call from the nurse practitioner reminding me of an appointment today. I thought… why don’t you just ask your questions now lady? Why are you wasting your time and mine? You obviously have time to call me now, why wait till tomorrow?

I know what it’s all about. It’s about racking up check marks in some form on some computer that all translate to billing somehow.

I’ll play along tonight when she calls and I’m not likely to be particularly cooperative or compliant. 

The nurse practitioner was barking orders at me during the confirmation call.

Then I got another two text messages, along with a demand that I sign into their conferencing system 10 minutes prior to the scheduled time.

Uh excuse me? When did I start working for them?

All of this is related to the complexities of systems. Digital ID simply takes a previously working simple system and makes it more difficult to manage. 

Imagine what happens when every single aspect of our lives are bounded by mandatory compliance and demands in service to any corporation or government entity that has access to our information.

How long until everyone must provide hours of their day, (translating to hours of their lives,) dedicated to nothing more than managing who, how, and what, has access to their lives. Imagine a situation wherein any misstep could mean that you don’t get something you need whether you’ve paid for it or not.

This insurance thing is one single aspect. Multiply it by 10 services, all attached to a digital ID and you’ve probably increased the points of failure by 1000.

I still don’t know what the status of my prescription is, and am researching safe ways to get off the drug entirely.

It’s not that I’m not interested in my health. It’s that I have zero trust in government, healthcare, or the common decency of people anymore.

That being said, I see no reason to participate in digital IDs. With the intrusive nature of text messages, cell phones, email, and all the rest of the modern world. I’m wondering if I can ween myself off technology entirely.

I rather like the concept put forward in the Jack Reacher series of books. In those, the main character has, his paper ID, a pension account he accesses via Western Union, and is not tied to any place or system.

He lives a simple unencumbered unconnected life.

That sounds really nice.

Now I’m off to deal with mandatory licensing for the dog, then updating payment methods on accounts for services, then I’ll spend some time on the phone with Apple to sort out some other screwups on my phone created by one of their software updates. Then I’ll have to make sure at least one of my devices has a full charge to be able to join this dumb shit conference call later today. [Honestly, I kind of liked it better when I had no health insurance it was one less thing to deal with.]

But all of this “Only takes a few minutes…”

Minutes that I’ll never get back!

See how that works?

Really, who didn’t see this coming?

Buckle your seatbelts, it’s gonna be a bumpy two weeks or so.

The Senate Democrats have voted (right on schedule) with the Republican majority to end the Government shutdown.

Honestly, I think it was nothing more than a political stunt on the part of the Democrats in Washington. They wanted to look like they were strong and doing something prior to the off cycle elections. They needed something to energize their base and were willing to use the American people as pawns.

Some of them in recent weeks admitted that they were using the American People as “leverage“.

How that isn’t offensive to people is beyond me. Really? Is that all the D.C. Democrats think of the American people and specifically their base? We’re all supposed to be nothing but tools for them to get their way, even if “their way” is detrimental to the Country at large and increases the national debt & thereby taxes on the working class?

Oh sure they’ll say they want to tax the rich more, “To make them pay their fair share” But ultimately the working class folks pay the tab. Because taxes keep going up for them too.

NYC will be interesting. With their new Mayor, the rich are already making their exit plans. To counter this, NY politicians are suggesting that they’ll still find a way to tax people that leave the city and state as if they still live there. What is that, if not indentured servitude?

It should be noted that the United States does the same thing to people living outside the country & charges people who choose to give up their US Citizenship a shit ton of taxes for the privilege to boot. So there is a precedent. California floated a similar indentured status law and was thwarted by the courts.

What about those folks in the country that don’t work? What about those who live on generational welfare? Their benefits are more than the average retiree receives and oh yeah, depending on the retiree’s income, they’re still subject to taxes while those receiving benefits typically are not.

The disparity is striking. Retirees still have to pay for supplemental health care. While the people on public assistance get virtually everything for free.

The shutdown should be a wake up call to everyone that there is a major problem that needs to be fixed. When you have people on benefits saying that their children are going hungry while they’re filming their TicToc on a brand new $1500 mobile phone with $100+ Nail & $200 hair extensions. Something is very wrong.

The first part of the lesson should be, if you’re that dependent on the government for your basic daily needs then you’re a slave to the government. The other part is the government has broken its promise to the elderly and retirees regarding all the money they’ve taken and mismanaged from working people’s paychecks for decades.

The D.C. Democrats were demanding extended funding for the ACA. Why? Wasn’t that system supposed to be self sustaining? That’s what we were told. We were also told that the ACA would control healthcare costs and make healthcare affordable for everyone.

It didn’t!

In fact there are a lot of people that the ACA outright hurt because it drove doctors into early retirement faster (many good doctors retired because they refused to have their patient interactions monitored by government and insurance companies or have the cost of their private practice double or triple because they had to add more staff to handle the paperwork).

Then ACA made the actual healthcare insurance plans too expensive to afford unless you were working for a corporation. Then the money that folks, as employees, kicked in pretax to cover increasing healthcare prices and lower quality of service drove salaries up resulting in higher taxes but lower effective wages.

The end result was more people on more government subsidized plans that were also generally unaffordable and resulted in them having the subsidies thought of as taxable income creating an end of year tax burden that drove them further toward poverty instead of helping them get back on the path toward economic stability.

Then to pour vinegar into the wounds. The D.C. Democrats flooded the country with “Asylum seekers” A.K.A. illegal immigrants and gave them all food, housing, and medical care, at levels higher than Americans in poverty, our own retirees, and children.

All on the taxpayer dime, during a declared pandemic, with no vaccination  requirements, and looked the other way when these people were protesting in the streets while our own citizens were enduring unreasonable lockdowns.

This is the Democrat party as I see it. It’s insane!

The government shutdown and all the Democrat antics prior, gave New York City an avowed communist/muslim Mayor. Took away the legally voted for, redistricting commission in California, placing drawing voting districts in the hands of a Governor. And gave the people of Virginia a person who may be a wolf in sheep’s clothing for Governor if you look at her voting record.

They used the shutdown as a mechanism to (unsurprisingly) paint the Republicans as the bad guys. The D.C. Democrats callously used the suffering (they created) of the American people to forward their agenda.

The D.C. Republicans were willing to pass a Continuing Resolution that simply held government expenditures at current levels.

The spineless Republicans know that government spending is too high. The moment the Democrats shut the government down, Republican response should have been to pass a bill in the house that enacted needed budget restraints to actually reduce spending to pre-pandemic levels instead of kicking the budget can down the road.

As it is, the idiotic Republicans have set themselves and the country, up to be held hostage next year when the D.C. Democrats decide to throw another tantrum in the run up to the 2026 election.

We know they will, all this has done is made sure that in the run up to the midterms, the Democrats will pitch another temper tantrum and use the American People as “leverage” to hopefully regain a majority in the House and Senate. It will be a replay of the midterms in 2018 and their aim is to cripple the Trump administration for its remaining two years. It will be the old “Wash, Rinse, Repeat”.

Yes enacting a real budget instead of a CR would have extended the government shutdown. But it would have forced the government to really look at the EBT/Snap/Welfare benefits and make adjustments. While they were at it, they could have looked at military wages and adjusted those, to make sure that our soldiers families weren’t living in poverty while their husband or wife was defending the nation. Maybe, they could have actually created a balanced budget and enacted necessary cuts that we so desperately need.

I’m glad it didn’t come to nuking the filibuster. That would have ensured that the Democrats, if they ever come to power again, would irrevocably alter the country toward a more communist 3rd world shit hole.

All my personal opinion aside. Now we’re looking at weeks of grandstanding and spin by D.C. Democrats to make them look like heroes who “Forced” the “Nasty” Republicans into feeding hungry people. 

They and their apparatchiks in the media will crow about their “wins” in off cycle elections and owning the Republicans. They’ll enter the 24 hour news cycle keep repeating their insane spin, and everyone will forget that they were the ones that shutdown the government. They were the ones who used their constituents suffering as tools, not to get their way, but to win a few elections. 

Then in November of 2026. Everyone will be surprised that they shut the government down again. People will be angry at the “evil”, “Nazi”, Republicans and vote Democrat. Most people will claim they didn’t see it coming.

Folks, this whole thing was nothing more than a proof of concept experiment. It was carried out at the taxpayer’s expense. The next government shutdown will be worse.

You can’t capitulate to spoiled children.

Unfortunately, The Republicans just did, and if you didn’t see that the Democrats were going to suddenly change course after this election, you’ve not been paying attention.

Who is Sydney Sweeny

11725_SydneySweeney 960x720.A while back I heard this name Sydney Sweeney.

It appears she’s some actress. I figured, “Ignore”.

I thought it was another actress shooting her mouth off about something or other. I didn’t bother opening any articles about whatever controversy she was involved in. I assumed that she was another Hollywood dumbass shrieking about any of the 10 issues that they’re always shrieking about. 

Trump, ICE, Deportations, Trans Rights, Abortion, Republicans are NAZIs, blah, blah, blah.

American eagle sydney sweeney.I thought that whatever she was saying, and whoever she was, would blow over and I’d never hear the name again.

And indeed it did blow over, eclipsed by the next “Crisis” of the 24 hour news cycle.

I guess the crisis was the government shutdown.

But in the past couple of days she popped up again. I thought, “What fresh hell?”

Then as I was clicking around on the internet last night, I inadvertently clicked on some article about her in some interview.

American Eagle ad Sydney Sweeney has great jeans American Eagle.Apparently, the first controversy that I ignored was that Sweeney had appeared in a Jeans ad for American Eagle. The tag line was “Sydney Sweeney has Great Jeans”

Sweeney was in a short video ad. She’s got a great figure, and the ad itself hearkened back to a point in our history where models with good figures routinely displayed merchandise in suggestive poses. You’d think it would be another ad campaign that came and went.

It should have.

Except, that because she was a white woman appearing in an ad with the tag line “Great Jeans”. Apparently the left lost their shit over it. When is the left not losing their shit over something?

“Great Jeans” was heard by the left morons as “Great Genes” and they made it about race. That’s what started the controversy. Yawn!!!

I don’t know about the rest of America, but I’m really sick of seeing obese people bouncing around in overly tight clothing being portrayed as sex symbols. Yeah, maybe they are to a certain segment of the population, but in the main, I suspect that people would rather see healthy weight models in appropriate clothing in advertisements.

Big Rapper Sues Lyft Dajua Blanding known as Dank Demoss 1024x600 3810616762.Spandex is a privilege, not a right. I’m personally put off seeing women in stretchy fabrics that look like over stuffed sausage casings and being told it’s beautiful.

It’s not. The rapper Dank Demoss is the epitome of what I see when I run across ads with fat models. I realize this entity is too large for even the most outlandish of the ads lately, but she’s the mental image I see.

Sydney Sweeney popped up again in the past few days because of an interview for GQ.

The interviewer, Katherine Stoeffel, appeared to be “fishing” for some kind of controversy and at one point asked, “Is there something that you want to say about the ad itself,” she asked. “The criticism of the content was basically that, maybe specifically in this political climate, white people shouldn’t joke about genetic superiority.

Sweeney replied, “I think that when I have an issue that I want to speak about, people will hear.

Folks loved Sweeney’s answer for a number of reasons. She handled the question, she didn’t make waves, she acknowledged that the question had been asked, and chose not to add any fuel to the controversy.

In a way she let the air out of the controversy entirely. Without saying it, she said that the people who created the controversy made up something to be offended by, then tried to damage her career and the American Eagle brand over nothing.

Yeah, the ad campaign stirred up press with an interesting double entendre, but it wasn’t racist as many in the media claimed. After all an ad is designed to create a need. All ads essentially say, “If you buy our product you’ll be more beautiful, more commanding, shoulder to shoulder with the movers and shakers, in the top 10 percent, on your way to success, etc.”

That’s the nature of advertisement. It’s supposed to feed you a dream. Remember Calvin Klein ads? They were racy as hell and always had hot men and women selling over priced underwear that no-one really saw you wearing. But you knew and that may have boosted your confidence. Was it worth it? Maybe.

Sydney Sweeney does apparently have good genes, and the jeans did look great on her.

I watched the ad. I liked it. 

I liked the nostalgia. I wondered if American Eagle made menswear.

So obviously the Ad did what it was supposed to do. It made me aware of the brand.

I can say that most ads these days don’t do that for me. I can’t tell you about many ads I’ve seen in the past 2 years that made as favorable an impression on me. Most of the ads have some overdriven music or repetitive synthetic percussion beat that’s more annoying than “Ear Catching” and they’re a visual mess. Some ads I’ve seen leave me wondering what the hell the product or brand they were trying to promote were.

Ozempic commercials I remember, because their music is happy happy, but they’ve got a bunch of obese people jiggling around and essentially making fat the new norm. They say to me, “Hey being too fat to comfortably move is okay, and manageable, if you inject this super expensive crap in your body. We’ll be ready with $20,000 knee and hip replacement surgery when you need it. And your health insurance might cover it.”

Jaguar 1732050077767 1732050093241.png.webp.I don’t think that’s really a good message. I personally think that a better message would be “eat right, get more exercise, and you’ll appreciate that people notice your effort.”

Then of course there was the Jaguar commercial. That one is memorable because whatever they were selling, I want no part of.

This latest blip of Sydney Sweeney will pass in a few days. Then she’ll go back to being an actor.

The next crisis will pop up in a day or two. Maybe the government will reopen and the news cycle will be busy painting the Schumer crowd as “Heroes of the Republic,” for voting yes on a Continuing Resolution that they voted “Yes” on multiple times over the past 2 or 3 years.

Or they won’t and the rioting and looting will start.

Either way…

Yawn…

Why Bother?

Gavin Newsom Biography.Newsom with his political stunt called Prop 50 “Won”.

Of course he won, Newsom and the California Democratic machine always “wins”

In one of the most gerrymandered states, Newsom gets to gerrymander it further.

The original California Redistricting commission, whose charter says something about grouping communities with similar interests and needs made our congressional representation Judy Chu who in addition to being wholly ineffective has the heart of her district in the wealthy Pasadena, Montrose, La Cañada / Flintridge, Alta Dena areas. 

Those of us living in the mountain communities and high desert have little in common with those areas. We were better off with Jay Olbernolte who actually lives in the mountain community of Big Bear. He’s also lived his whole life in and around the high desert if I recall correctly.

But the difference between La Cañada / Flintridge is astounding. They’re concerned about whether their Latte is properly mixed, the people on this side of the mountain are concerned about paying our heating bills so we don’t freeze to death.

Their interests are if the automatic gate to their community is working, our interests are is the freeway open so that we can get to work.

Our communities have very little in common. Not that it matters because the candidates that are presented from that side of the mountain literally don’t know where we are nor do they know anything about the “Fly Over” area they see from their first class window seats as they fly to Las Vegas or Lake Tahoe for the weekend.

After the census when the redistricting commission was doing their work, Jerry & I spent a lot of time on phone calls and writing letters politely explaining why some of their redistricting schemes improperly grouped us with communities that had nothing in common with us.

We managed, with our voices joining with thousands of others to prevent some of the worst ideas. But it was clear that the Commission itself was seeking to slice up Republican strongholds. The mountain communities and the high desert is unsurprisingly, heavily Republican, Libertarian, or independent conservative. There’s a lot of working class people who have little time or concern about the “Feel Good” Democrat agenda. We want low crime, were/are fighting to stop illegal pot farms that steal water from fire hydrants to water their pot harvests and enforce their will with illegal guns. We want the roads to be maintained, and a lot of us moved up here to get away from the noise, crime, and insanity of the cities. There’s a lot of folks here who escaped LA, choosing to commute 80 miles to work, so they could have peace & quiet. They wanted to live in a high trust environment and know their neighbors.

Unfortunately, a large chunk of this area got consumed by a democrat district. Oddly, the democrat district is one of 3 that cover the foothills from Glendora to Rancho Cucamonga. Even stranger, is that the district that consumed us, isn’t even the closest. 

Clearly, whatever “Logic” the California Redistricting commission used was designed to associate an extremely wealthy LA suburb with people on the completely opposite side of the financial spectrum.

It wasn’t just the congressional district. It was the state representative district too. By the time all the wrangling was done, we went from a Republican congressional district and a swing seat state representative district to solid Democrat representation all the way. Before the redistricting we could actually contact someone and get things taken care of.

Neither level of representatives have ever visited this area. Judy Chu as a photo op tried banging on an ICE detention center in Adelanto once, a few months ago demanding entrance. Adelanto is not in her district and I’m sure she didn’t have any clue where she was. She could have dropped by a community center meeting or two on that Tuesday as she headed back to the lap of luxury in her Pasadena area home.

I don’t even know the state representative’s name. He’s wholly ineffective and the few times I dialed into his “Town Hall” conferences he refused to answer any questions from folks on this side of the mountain, concentrating instead on the LA side of his district. (Truth to tell, I don’t think the guy even knew he represented those folks.)

All of this is to say, when the redistricting commission was done with us, we effectively had no real representation. It was representation in name only.

Now along comes Newsom. Not content with lots of disenfranchised people, he wants to make even more people un-represented. He wants to silence dissenting voices to his authority and even though he’s on his way out, he wants to screw over more people of California.

I suspect he’s got two goals here. 1) He’s using the California electorate to give a middle finger to President Trump. 2) He’s setting up a solid Newsom voting bloc called California to propel his Presidential Aspirations.

It should be noted that a huge chunk of California called San Bernardino County actually voted to investigate secession from the state of California to become the 51st state. In part because Newsom’s management of California state resources left the entire country without many needed resources that they pay for in taxation. San Bernardino county is larger in total square miles than some entire states on the east coast.

Newsom doesn’t care though, it won’t be his problem and the next election cycle which will put a new governor in Sacramento will cause the people of San Bernardino to pause their efforts hoping that the new governor will be a good one.

In my opinion, they’ll be pissing into the wind. The next governor of the state will in all likelihood be just as bad as Newsom.

It’s with all of this frustration as a backdrop that I voted “NO” on Prop 50 on Tuesday.

I knew going in that my time would be better spent jerking off in a truckstop toilet but I voted anyway.

Even as I was casting my vote on a single issue, (it was the only issue on the ballot,) I thought to myself why bother voting at all in California? All dissenting voices are immediately drowned out by the majority of Democrat voters. Many of whom, apparently thought they were voting to impeach President Trump.

So in addition to the one party rule the Democrat party has in California. A rather substantial portion of those Democrat voters have no clue how the government works at either a State or Federal level. They happily vote against whatever “Enemy” the Democrat party tells them to.

So I thought to myself, “Why bother?”

There is no way voting in anything to do with California politics will change the outcome. No matter how much research or effort I put into carefully considering my position on a candidate it will not matter. Nor will other people like me ever regain any kind of voice in California politics. (As an aside, I vote the candidate, not the party.)

Newsom is technically violating California Law with Proposition 50. It’s billed as a “Temporary” measure. But there’s no real expiration date on it. I suppose that the 2030 census could reset the Governor’s ability to redraw district maps. But by then, no-one will remember that the California redistricting commission actually has that control and de-facto the redistricting will remain under the direct control of the Governor’s office.

Who’s the “King”? The Dictator? This is some real 3rd world shit right here.

This realization has led me to believe that voting here is a pointless exercise and that California is lost.

I’d been contemplating moving to an all RED state. Then I thought, “That’s the exact same bullshit you have in California, just the other side of the coin.”

Now I contemplating moving to a state that is conservative leaning, but Purple. It seems that if I’m going to move, perhaps a purple state would have more people like me. Folks that are interested and engaged in exercising their right to vote for the benefit of the people of the state, not the enrichment or control of political parties. People who can have discussions and debates about ideas without fear of being cancelled or having violence done to them.

Then it occurred to me that what I’m seeking is the real American spirit. A concept of “One for all and all for one.”

Realistically, that has probably never truly existed. Humans are after all, inherently self centered and self absorbed. That concept is a dream and it has two sides. One is Communism and the other is a constitutional Republic.

In the one, it’s about government mandated compliance, in the other it’s about the willingness to compromise so that everyone “Hopefully” rises and lives the life they choose in the way that they choose.

Surprisingly Newsom may have done something good for me personally. He changed my view about what kind of state I wish to live in. So I guess I owe him thanks for broadening my perspective.

I also think that I’ll hold off buying a new house. Instead I’ll rent maybe in several places until after the 2028 election. If Newsom by hook or crook should “win” the Presidency then I’ll be able to move out of the United States and live out my days somewhere else like Poland, in peace.