Month: January 2013

Posted on

Really? This is an issue?

NewImage

Over the past several days, I’ve noticed the press slowly picking up and more breathlessly repeating the story that Prince Harry said that he has killed Taliban in Afghanistan.

Let me see,

He’s serving in his nations military — Check!

He’s in a gunship — Check!

He’s in a war zone — Check!

He’s being shot at — Check!

In my book…

It goes without saying that he’s killed some Taliban. The question shouldn’t have even been asked. It was probably asked by some asinine reporter looking for something sensationalist. Problem is this isn’t sensational it’s a grim reality of war.

People die. 

Prince Harry is doing his job, which is to take orders from his commanding officers, and to protect his crew if that means opening up with a 30mm chain gun on a pissant Taliban fuck so be it.

What answer would you expect?

Do you suppose the troops in war zones have been planting posies? That somehow RPG and AK-47 fire magically turns into rainbows and happy fairy sprinkles?

NewImage

Prince Harry answered the question. Now he’s being criticized for answering the question.

Had he evaded answering the question he’d have been criticized for evasion.

The man was damned either way and like most men backed into a corner by slimy scum bags (in this case liberal reporters) he decided to answer 100% truthfully. After all with the truth, you don’t have to remember what lie you told which person.

I say good for Prince Harry. I’m glad he’s doing his job and not getting much in the way of “Special” treatment. In future, he may be more connected with the common man and will be in a position to suggest or represent the common mans interests back home.

Aside from his mother not being terribly happy about him being in the military, (name a Mom who is happy about her children being in harms way) I personally think that the young prince is a good man.

His mother shows through in all the best ways. In general, I imagine she’d be proud of both her boys.

I guess the article pissed me off because of the fucked up connections that the writer and then the Afghan and Taliban leaders made.

I suppose I can perhaps excuse Hamid Karzai and the Taliban leader Zabihullah Mujahid for not knowing what a PlayStation or Xbox is.

After all they still think fire is the magic of the gods.

You need to have electricity to use a PlayStation. Most of Afghanistan is barely into the stone-age just slightly above flinging their excrement at each other…

Prince Harry making the comparison to his childhood game controls is completely logical.

After all if you make a sophisticated high tech weapon system similar to a familiar game interface then you don’t have to waste a lot of time training your soldiers how to use the weapon. It save time, money, and minimizes practice time.

But that doesn’t mean that the Prince was referring to the war as “Fun”. Unfortunately that’s the spin Harry’s comment is being given.

NewImage

Hamid Karzai is concerned about troop withdrawals. Others are concerned about the erosion of relations between the troops and locals…

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but isn’t this a problem in Afghanistan already?

Don’t we have the locals and our troops stationed in separate areas because of friendly fire incidents?

Isn’t this the place where “Friendlies”  walk in to cafeterias and blow themselves up or shoot men they’ve spent months or years training with, working with, and living with? 

I’d say that the relations are already well and truly fucked up. I’m all for getting our people the hell out of the place and letting the locals cannibalize each other if they wish.

We have the asshole Taliban guy Zabihullah Mujahid calling the Prince a NewImagecoward for “speaking when he was out of harms way… “

Uh yeah, dumbass. The interview was done while Harry was on duty in your shit hole country. Oh by the way, when was the last time you poked your head out of a cave?

Why the fuck do we even know what you think? I’d suspect that most of us couldn’t give a crap less.

Then there’s the Peacenik Lindsey German of the “Stop the war coalition” asking how the Prince knows the people he killed were Taliban.

Well Lindsey… the Prince probably had a fairly good idea when the people on the ground were shooting at his helicopter.

In my reality someone shooting at me is an enemy… I’m not going to take the time before I shoot back to ask for confirmation of their political or religious affiliation. You Lindsey are perfectly welcome to go talk to the people shooting at you if you’d like. 

Hey before you go… let me put this pretty vest on you. Uh no, Lindsey it’s not body armor It’s 30 lbs of C-4 explosive. Here, hold this button down while you’re talking to those very angry people waving the guns at you…

NewImage

So that Lindsey, has some ability to sleep at night… Let me offer this logic to you.

You’re in a helicopter

You’re flying over Taliban occupied territory

People on the ground are shooting at you (Or flinging poo)

ergo

They are in all likelihood Taliban… in deed if not in actual political/religious affiliation.

Which means… It’s perfectly acceptable to squeeze the trigger on that shiny 30mm chain gun until the people on the ground stop shooting! 

It’s completely ridiculous to ask or publish a question asking how the Prince knew they were Taliban.

I’m all for leaving the Afghans and for that matter the whole stinking shithole known as the Middle East squarely in the middle of the stone-age.

Their belief structures are a threat. They are a prime example of religion retarding human development and their civilizations (such as they are) are examples of retrograde development.

Yeah, I have no pity, sympathy, or concern for those people. I’m for complete isolation of the area.

Quarantine it, let the infection of their religion of hate burn itself out.

Call the Middle East the Spanish Influenza of thought processes.

Quarantine the area and wait a 100 years or so for them to quit twitching. Maybe then you nuke ’em from orbit just to make sure…

We don’t have to be nice to our enemies.

Let’s stop deluding ourselves, no matter what we do in the Middle East we will never be liked.

The best we can hope for is that the people there understand death comes on swift wings if you screw with the west.

Posted on

Inauguration day

PresObama

Couldn’t stomach it. I tuned in for a little while, a very little while. I saw the President trying to look interested. 

I know these public events must be trying for he and his family.

I actually feel sorry for him.  On the other hand he could have said screw it and not sought a second term. That would probably have underscored the futility and just how broken the government is to the American people. Perhaps that would have been a catalyst for real change.

But instead President Obama chose a second term in office. So there he sits with a mask of feigned interest on his face.

Where I in his position I’d probably be thinking of all the things requiring my attention stacking up in the oval office.

I’d be wondering just how far this pomp & circumstance was going to set me back and what time I’d be getting to bed.

The President looked really tired.

(Not to sound like Dr Who when he ended a Prime Ministers term with the words “Don’t you think she looks tired?”)

What is that old quote? “Heavy is the head that wears the crown.”

I hope this four years is better than the last.

I’m not overly optimistic.

Posted on

Gotta love hypocrites

Journal News publisher Janet Hasson

A letter has appeared from Janet Hasson the publisher of The Journal News  explaining why the paper has decided to take the gun permit map down.

Her letter doesn’t hold water, yet she’s trying to spin taking the map down as a victory.

Read the comments after her letter and It’s pretty obvious that the heat must have been and will hopefully continue to be withering against her and the paper.

To our readers:
 
In the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings, The Journal News thought the community should know where gun permit holders in their community were, in part to give parents an opportunity to make careful decisions about their children’s safety.
 
The Journal News mapped the public database of permit holders, placing a dot on the address of every permit holder in Westchester and Rockland counties and providing the name and street address of each holder. The dots conveyed a powerful message: gun permit holders are everywhere in our counties.
 
But public reaction to the posting of names and street addresses was swift and divided. Many in the community expressed their gratitude for The Journal News’ decision to make the information available, but permit holders were outraged at what they considered to be an invasion of privacy. Gun owners from across the country vocally conveyed their anger and accused The Journal News of having exposed permit holders and non-permit holders alike to the risk of burglaries and other crimes. Hundreds of threats were made to Journal News staffers.
 
So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.
 
Today The Journal News has removed the permit data from lohud.com. Our decision to do so is not a concession to critics that no value was served by the posting of the map in the first place. On the contrary, we’ve heard from too many grateful community members to consider our decision to post information contained in the public record to have been a mistake. Nor is our decision made because we were intimidated by those who threatened the safety of our staffers. We know our business is a controversial one, and we do not cower.
 
But the database has been public for 27 days and we believe those who wanted to view it have done so already. As well, with the passage of time, the data will become outdated and inaccurate.
 
Equally important, the legislature has weighed in on the issue and representatives of residents from across the state have said that some New Yorkers who hold gun permits should have the right to keep that information private. As a news organization, we are constantly defending the public’s right to know. Consequently we do not endorse the way the legislature has chosen to limit public access to gun permit data. The statute is very broad and allows anyone who meets certain criteria within qualifying categories to keep their permit information private. When the moratorium concludes, far fewer permit holders will be identifiable, and those who want to know which houses on their block may have guns will not be able to get that information. But we are not deaf to voices who have said that new rules should be set for gun permit data.
 
Make no mistake, The Journal News will continue to report aggressively on gun ownership. We will continue to pursue our request for data from Putnam County, and will closely analyze the data for Westchester and Rockland counties when it once again becomes publicly available. And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.
 
Sincerely,

Janet Hasson

President and Publisher

Journal News Media Group

Here is the link to the article.

http://www.lohud.com/article/20130118/NEWS02/301180125/Letter-from-publisher-gun-map

They’ve removed the map and the information about the gun permits because the law said they have to.

Sadly, this is rather like locking the barn after the horses have escaped, there are no doubt copies replicated on countless servers, blogs, and on private computers worldwide.

In short The Journal News has created a situation that can never be undone.

In other related news there is this from ProjectVeritas

The video is about 10 minutes long and it’s very interesting to note a couple of things…

First, not one of the editors/reporters who describe themselves as anti-gun will place a sign on their lawns saying that their homes are essentially gun free zones

Second, a large percentage of the editors/reporters either have armed guards at their homes or they’ll call the police at the “drop of a hat”.

Talk about people that think nothing of the safety of others (regardless of what they say) but when it comes to their personal safety all the sudden their concerns about guns vanish.

I guess this is what Über liberalism is all about.

I’m reminded of the line from Plan 9 from Outer Space. “All you people of Earth are idiots” I supposed we could revise that line to read “All you non-liberals are idiots, you’re either with us or you’re racist morons!”