The news media losing their minds over a phrase in the background of a video that a Trump aid reposted, demonstrates that everything \u201cTrump” is under a microscope.\u00a0<\/p>\n
If only they\u2019d be as diligent with all things Biden. I\u2019m not going to hold my breath on that one.<\/p>\n
CNN though, has tracked down the origins of the offending comment. They have determined that it was \u201cnot a fascist dog whistle<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Well that\u2019s a relief! CNN of course being known in recent years for their amazingly accurate, in depth reporting, and marvelous \u201cJournalists\u201d.<\/p>\n I watched the video in question. It was interesting, the \u201cOffending Phrase\u201d was \u201cunified Reich\u201d.<\/p>\n The phrase literally appeared in the background of a video montage and was part of a newspaper headline that was quoting a German article about something which I don\u2019t accurately recall.<\/p>\n When I went back to review the video for this piece, all the videos I can find online at this point appear to have been intentionally blurred. That really pisses me off!<\/p>\n Not only did the Left<\/em> raise a stink about words taken out of context, they appear to have intentionally obfuscated the source material, making it difficult for the casual observer to do their own fact checking. I believe everyone should be fact checking articles that interest them. Reliance upon some oracle<\/strong><\/em> of fact checking is just as stupid as blindly believing the original piece of questionable information.<\/p>\n The video I originally saw, showed a newspaper background which was clearly vintage, judging from the style, and I think I recall seeing a date. In other words, this was a photo of a newspaper that became part of a video background that wasn\u2019t supposed to be read, it was just supposed to be a wallpaper for the video elements presented on top.<\/p>\n By the way, this \u201cunified Reich\u201d statement wasn\u2019t even talking about Naziism. The date I think I recall seeing on the paper was late 1920\u2019s, before the rise of Hitler. Oh let\u2019s not forget the word Reich actually has meanings in the German language other than its association with Hitler.<\/p>\n If the word isn\u2019t capitalized (reich) it generally translates to \u201cRich\u201d or similar meanings, \u201cwealth\u201d, \u201cmoney”, \u201ccostly”, \u201cfinery\u201d, & similar meanings.<\/p>\n If the word is capitalized, (Reich) then the general meaning is \u201ckingdom\u201d, \u201crealm”, or \u201cempire\u201d.<\/p>\n One example that caught my eye was this:<\/p>\n Dein Reich komme.<\/p>\n That one is biblical, in English it translates, \u201cthy Kingdom come\u201d.\u00a0<\/p>\n Recognize that phrase?<\/p>\n Note that \u201cempire\u201d and \u201crealm\u201d would also be generally appropriate translations and would fit in context. \u201cKingdom\u201d is chosen based on convention possibly due to earlier translations of the Bible from Greek or Aramaic.<\/p>\n What none of the initial news reports made mention of was, the video wasn\u2019t generated by the Trump campaign. The video was put together by someone who is a Trump fan, and showed their approval of Trump by putting together a montage of Trumps promises and comments, over a publicly available (template \/ background).<\/p>\n Based on the way the American news media reacted to this \u201cFan Video\u201d, you could cause all kinds of trouble.<\/p>\n Just find a German print news piece of Trump reciting The Lord\u2019s Prayer then paste that piece into an American hit piece, using it to damn Trump for inciting a Neo-Nazi uprising, because the word \u201cReich” would appear in the German text of the prayer.\u00a0<\/p>\n That would be interestingly ironic if you think about it.<\/p>\n Damning Trump because he prayed The Lord\u2019s prayer in a church and a German reporter dutifully translated it into German for their readership back home.<\/p>\n Context is everything. Has anyone ever asked why Hitler called the movement, \u201cThe Third Reich\u201d? Why not the First or the Fourth?<\/p>\n In the video I saw, the “Unified Reich\u201d headline appeared to be referring to some kind of production being improved, I want to say it was something to do with crops or farm yields.\u00a0<\/p>\n In that context, the headline could have said, \u201cblah blah yields increased due to unification of various realms in Germany.\u201d The journalist may have had a word limit in the headline and chose to imply Germany, using the word \u201cReich\u201d. Doing so eliminated several other words but got the point across. (I wonder if \u2018Cantons’ work in this context?<\/em>)<\/p>\n Remember, in the time before television, people actually read the entire paper, and headlines were meant to catch attention while providing a little taste of what in the article may be of interest to the reader.<\/p>\n Yes, I understand the concept. I\u2019m just not good at it. That\u2019s what made real<\/em> Journalists special. They were masters of language and conveying information. Journalism degrees used to actually mean something, as did most other degrees from reputable universities.<\/p>\n I don\u2019t even speak German. I speak English and bad English! That being said, I do know from a smattering of languages that I\u2019ve been exposed to, that words almost never have a singular meaning.<\/p>\n Words evolve over time, and that\u2019s why even in my native language there are multiple definitions of words. In nicer dictionaries there are often century notations about a particular definition. These century notations make it easier to glean the meaning of a word in one of Shakespeare\u2019s plays when contextually the modern definition of the word simply doesn\u2019t make sense.<\/p>\n I\u2019m a moron. If I know this, then I expect for the \u201cJournalists\u201d blathering on the boob tube nightly to know this as well.<\/p>\n After all, they\u2019re supposed to be my betters<\/span><\/em> aren\u2019t they?<\/p>\n The only reason I can imagine anyone seized on this \u201cUnified Reich\u201d headline is an unreasoning hatred of Donald Trump.<\/p>\n Whoever spun this into the “tempest in a tea pot,” it became must have been viewing the video almost frame by frame looking for anything to hurt Trump. Is that really the best use of one\u2019s time or life? Living in that kind of frothing hatred cannot be good for one\u2019s health.<\/p>\n Surely Trump has outright factually<\/em> said things that are disagreeable, which could, and should, be addressed with logic and reason. If he\u2019s such a bad guy then public discussion should be possible without resorting to misquoting or using out of context images.<\/p>\n That logic cuts both ways.<\/p>\n Why is it, issues surrounding Biden and his administration have gone unchallenged? Why is it that there is almost never public discussion regarding Biden\u2019s statements, or actions? Except, to walk them back.<\/p>\n If you think about it, “walking something back\u201d used to mean bringing something back from an outlier position to a more mainstream one. Now, it means flat out correction of erroneous statements. Why is this term used?<\/p>\n Because it looks really bad to have a press secretary or the news media saying, \u201cWe need to correct The President\u2019s statements\u2026\u201d on a daily basis. Correcting The President daily suggests that either The President is not a person of their word, The President is not actually in control, or The President is an idiot.<\/p>\n None of these are good looks, domestically or internationally, for The President of The United States of America.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court has said Biden can\u2019t make student debt go away at taxpayer\u2019s expense, Congress alone holds the purse strings.<\/p>\n Yet Biden has acted in defiance of both the Supreme Court and Congress on this matter. Is that not breaking the Law? Where is the public discussion about that?<\/p>\n Why has the media acted as a rubber stamp about this? Why haven\u2019t the pundits and wags called out the Biden administration on ignoring the ruling?<\/p>\n Yes, there\u2019s the taxpayer element but the more fundamental issue is that we have a President who is defying the Judicial and Legislative branches of government. That latter issue seems to be far<\/span> closer to a dictatorship, than anything Trump did while in office.<\/p>\n Perhaps someone should be going over every frame of a Biden speech or commercial. Perhaps someone in the CNN newsroom should be reporting on all the “Walk Backs\u201d of Biden\u2019s statements.\u00a0<\/p>\n To their credit in addition to CNN doing the research about the “unified Reich\u201d text, they\u2019ve also recently fact checked Biden\u2019s 9% inflation claim too.<\/p>\n They admitted on air, inflation was around 1.6% when Biden took office. Inflation shot up during COVID and topped out around 9% in 2022.<\/p>\n Biden continues to claim that inflation was 9% when he came into office and that it was a problem left to him by the Trump administration.<\/p>\n At least CNN is starting to apply some journalistic\u00a0 rigor. There may be hope for them, I\u2019m not holding my breath on that either.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The news media losing their minds over a phrase in the background of a video that a Trump aid reposted, demonstrates that everything \u201cTrump” is under a microscope.\u00a0 If only they\u2019d be as diligent with all things Biden. I\u2019m not going to hold my breath on that one. CNN though, has tracked down the origins … <\/p>\n
\n
\n