This is to replace the samsung Galaxy Tablet she’d been struggling with.
All the lady wanted to do was print some of her emails occasionally. And with the addition of a new printer AND 12.99 piece of software she could more or less, from the Galaxy.
I say “More or Less,” as long as she remembered how to access the software and waited long enough for the software to wake up the printer. Then remembered not to send the item to be printed several times because of the time it took for the Samsung OS to be overridden by the $12 piece of software.
Part of the software’s function is to allow the Galaxy to see that the printer was in fact ready, and had been available the whole time.
I’m unimpressed with the Samsung tablets just due to the experience I had with hers.
Android is an open OS and it’s a smart system. What Samsung did to the Android OS as they implemented it in the Galaxy Tablet is a crime.
I can’t see purposely limiting basic functionality in the hopes that you’ll force customers to buy your printers. Yes! I call printing basic functionality.
Arguably Apple engages in a similar closed system with FaceTime, AirDrop, and a number of other features. I recall that Apple took it in the shorts with the first generation iPad because it wouldn’t print.
I wish FaceTime could interface with Skype so that I didn’t have to have two pieces of software that did the same thing on my systems. I wish AirDrop and Bluetooth file sharing worked across devices regardless of the OS.
I’m a big believer in choosing a machine because I like its specs, looks, and comfort rather than what OS it runs.
Seamless connectivity is one of those things I believe in.
I ought to be able to make a video call from my iPhone to a friends android.
I should be able to do this WITHOUT having to turn on Skype, determine if the person I wanted to talk to is online. Text them if they’re not online, telling them I’d like to talk to them, then wait for their Skype call.
After all of that, hell it’s easier to just call ’em on the phone and burn cellular minutes.
Apple, with FaceTime has in fact made calling another Apple customer as simple as clicking on the video camera icon and the FaceTime application doesn’t have to be running at the receiving end. The new FaceTime VoIP feature is very nice too.
I video chat to my Apple enabled friends a lot more than my Skype or Google Hangout friends, precisely because of the seamless integration.
Seamless, that’s what I want and, as it turns out that’s all my retired parents and Aunt want too.
Before you write me off as another Apple fan.
I’ve worked with and owned PCs for years. I spent the last five years dealing with Blackberries and Androids. I’ve used Skype on the Android, I even thought that Google was going to make a unifying seamless application that would allow the user to call, or video chat, or use VoIP.
They do kind of, as long as you’re running their application in the background, and it hasn’t crashed, and you have a Google account.
So I know how that stuff works and how it doesn’t, especially if you’re running on limited internal memory on your device. When it works, it works pretty well.
However, the Apple solution works better.
That’s why I’m overjoyed that my Aunt has an iPad.
I’m hoping that in short order she’s going to have an iPhone too. I like the thought that she can walk into any Apple Store and get assistance. Unlike the situation where she walks into an AT&T store and is lied to or cheated, or “up-sold” to something she has no use for, but will have to pay for anyway.
I’m also jazzed that my Mom and Aunt will be chatting face to face more often.
After all, the technology was designed to bring us together, wasn’t it?